Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-10-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 12-10-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 12:04:09 PM
Creation date
10/6/2016 11:38:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/1985
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0.0.0 C%`' • <br /> ,. .._ . The, - question concerning the location of industrial land :Ixses - • •• <br /> . • received • a split response. Just over 34%oaf- the respondents •m <br /> . . • _ . indicated la preference for locating industrial =land uses -i,-n- • <br /> . . _ . : large industrial centers along major highways -outside the -Joint - =` . <br /> . Planning Brea. The development of such centers outside- of Town :-- -_-_- : <br /> • . • but: inside the JPA recieved approximately the same .support 'Cby • • . <br /> L-; : : 17% : of- - the respondents) as developing the -same with -moderate : F. • - M <br /> . size centers located in Town along major roads.: • . . - . - <br /> • I <br /> • - -- There- - was i overwhelming support expressed for the desi-gnat-ion • - <br /> _._ _ . - ands - reservation of recreational areas and parks -Chapel Hill ' 7 <br /> _ •-and the :'JPA by government purchase (through bond referendums) _ <br /> _ -_-_"=• or, in certain i areas, a prohibition of development.: -- : . - . _ _ _ . <br /> . . Questions about the types of non-resided -Land uses--that- :-:=. <br /> - _ . . should• be allowed along 1-40 Corridor indicated a wide .range of. : - ;- -: choices. . : Responses generally indicate a preference fort office :- = -- <br /> _: : : and institutional, commercial, a - •combination.. - - of_ . _ <br /> . - - wholesale/commercial/manufacturing/industriarl;: . =or t ig#t:•deirsitty . _ <br /> - residential ! land uses, or open space at the'_1-4i interchanges.= = : ~ - : <br /> • - - :._ _ . Open- space,) office and institutional., commercial,.: -the wIcVm/_i a - <br /> - - • combination,: and commercial land uses are the -preferred land-- •-., • •: <br /> uses along the rest of the I-4O corridor. - -•. _ - - .. • _ - <br /> _. ..___ Problems. w_ h Publ c_Sexvicesand go_mmun , y Fagil-)ties, It- is ____ ___ <br /> - - interesting to note that 29 respondents or a -tittle over -49%•of -• - - . <br /> _ _s- . the:• -total meted any problems with the • existing community .- <br /> . • = •.-service• prov1iders or facilities. Most mentioned -were recreation <br /> - -• - . . areas-• and parks, -the Orange Water and Sewer -Authority :4OWASA?-,- -: <br /> - • -• • -4 and- police protection, "other" problems, and fire protecttorr . <br /> .- <br /> • . Add tionaI Tissues: Just over 33% of the responndents indicated . _ <br /> that there were additional policy issues important .to consider <br /> • - While developing the land use plans for the JPA and Chapel Hill - . - <br /> - -_ = - that.. •had- • net been addressed. These issues centered around the : : - -- - • • • <br /> provision of human services, and the limitations of efforts <br /> . - such as- this; and what the respondents ultimately would like to - • - • <br /> • see result from all this planning. 2. , - - - . . - <br /> Gvncl,usin j • <br /> - : _ e The : quest-ioryaire responses and comments generally show a broad, • - . <br /> . : . -• , understandin of the land use planning issues facing- Chapel- <br /> - • Hill- and th JPA. Some of the suggestions of alternative goals: - <br /> - or. strategi are worthy- of consideration during the balance of •- • <br /> this planning effort. • - <br /> • <br /> • <br /> ..._.. . . _ . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.