Orange County NC Website
0t, PAGE <br /> COUNTY OF ORANGE <br /> 1985-86 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN - PARTS II - IV - <br /> General _ P1anngT _ ptaritlag J 0561 • <br /> / DEPAR <br /> ' DIVISION 1 ACCOU 1T COOE• <br /> - : -iIIhB. Productivity improvements which could be made in the forthcoming year:include: <br /> 1'):Within the•present. budget - The development of checklists for a I 1 i and <br /> _ .,:development:.applicattonsproredures and the preparation of.a-Standard Procedures <br /> . -.:-Manual would improve productivity by providing staff•with clearcut"gu"idel "ines - <br /> regarding each procedure utilized in the department.-Thts would'rednce,-the <br /> - - : necessity of having to ask others what procedure to follow, how it- is to .be- • <br /> - • - administered, etc., It would also -reduce the amount of-time s.pent,dealing with <br /> --citizens in,-that copies of pertinent procedures could be-madd available <br /> to them.Jhe problem with such a work element is the lack-of time to prepare <br /> a comprehensive procedures 'manual,. . . - <br /> : A:second means-of increasing productivity.would be to establish.a definit'rve - <br /> • • . _policy on overtime work. Authorizing compensatory time off.defeats the purpose. <br /> ::- in that staff may be available* to work overtime in one instance but taking • <br /> time off in another when they are needed just as bad. - <br /> Another'epti.on is a cash payment for overtime worked,,-but.this is ineffec :r <br /> ■ <br /> •• _ ' - In:that additional appropriations to cover overtime :expenses would:be nece ary. <br /> `As.an incentive to get work done within the present operating budget, it might <br /> _ - _ -- work, but ,i-t would •still require funding f ram aiiother:sbricc Fell tiii•n'•1he County_ <br /> • • budget. - ' : • ... ' <br /> : Productivity can .on•ly be increased so much, and there-must be some incentives <br /> - . .- {other 'than.pride' in one's work and an opportunity for advancement) to encourage <br /> • 'one to increase their productivity level . To date, such incentives are lacking <br /> -or those which existed taken away. There is also a real question of when <br /> . quality becomes expendable at the expense of,product'ivity. 'Thi•s is a -real ' <br /> .. : i ssue•wi thi n the department .i in that' staff is asked to•do more and mare,..but-wi tt <br /> .to- increase in staff and no 'compensation for work performed. If the Planning <br /> Board and Board of Commissioners desire quantity as well as quality, additional <br /> staff must be .considered. strongly. <br /> 2)':On a.one-time _basis, - The preparation of a Standard Procedures Manual would <br /> . assist staff in performance of their duties. A study of the department and <br /> identifying specific means of increasing productivity levels would be beneficial <br /> '-- --- -- as well. As the staff does not currently have time to perform such a -study, a <br /> . - one-time appropriation of $15,000-$24,000 might be•advisable for the purpose <br /> • - of hiring a professional consultant to perform such work. If not feasible on ' <br /> a• depa rtmenta l level ; this might be undertaken on 'a County-wide basis. <br /> - <br /> IV. There are no •ex$'5fed'• increases in service demands during the period 1985-86 <br /> through' '1989-90 other than those brought about by increases in development <br /> proce activity.ure 'established byoactiongof service Board be new <br /> d programs/11r fommissionet <br /> - procedures'es <br /> I li' <br /> • <br /> ; :1 31 . <br />