Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-10-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 12-10-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 12:04:09 PM
Creation date
10/6/2016 11:38:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/1985
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 000034 0 0 0 3 4 PAGE 11 Q>� ___ .._ <br /> F <br /> COUNTY OF ORANGE ' <br /> 5. 1985-86 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN - PARTS II - IV <br /> i+ <br /> - General / Planning EEosaonaControL/ 0561 • <br /> I -._- . FUND - - --: / DEPARTMENT <br /> 'DI�VISIQN / ACCOUNT• CODE: <br /> 11A. For Change # 5 <br /> h - . 1-). S'he-current fee schedule for plan reviews, plan waivers and-grading permits' <br /> ry, - .,was:adopted- by the Board of Commissioners in 1981 . The reirenucs derived from - _ <br /> f _ - such fees, represent approximately 30% of the operating-Costs of the-Erosion_= V - <br /> i, Con krol:9�l0 00n. The fee schedule needs to be reviewed' to determine if <br /> -fees can be• raised to make the program more self-supporting-. Thin is-a concern - - <br /> . <br /> -0 - , - •• • im that: reductions in Federal and State assistance to counties-may necessitate'_ <br /> -- . more .reliance on local funding for program implementation. The fee schedule- - <br /> 4- also needs. to be evaluated to remove inequities In application. For example, <br /> " approximately $8,600': <br /> __ ---- a golf course with 100 acres disturbed would have to pay app' <br /> in`grad-ing permit fees. While a number of inspections would be required <br /> .=.i or <br /> sueh:a development, the fee involved appears much me actual paw <br /> actual,time spent on driving to and from the site, conducting inspections; ' <br /> ,3. and answering inquiries of contractors on site. <br /> ; <br /> Iz - <br /> ;- . ._ 2) Other alternatives are not available which would provide revenues to support„ <br /> ,- the Erosion Control program. <br /> ;'' 3) The proposed• revision of the fee schedule woul4 not affect other departments. <br /> 4) The proposal. is not part of a longer range plan. • <br /> _ ' 5) There would be no impact on service indicators. • <br /> ;f 111A. The hiring of a Planning Technician and turning over all drafting dresponsi�lilities <br /> to that. person freed ah Erosion Control Officer (split position) <br /> time the conduction of insPection activities. This enabled the Division to handle <br /> ,r al-1 inspection requests without delay and without increase in'staff. - <br /> ^' B. Productivity within the Erosion Control Division is at a high level. Few changes <br /> are necessary other than to provide computer access via the provision of a CRT- <br /> �';- <br /> - - Word Processor-. The. equiipment is beneficial to staff in drafting ordinance amendments <br /> "2 monthly reports. and technical assistance documents. No additional funding is <br /> 2< _ needed on a one-time basis other than the purchase of that equipment. - <br /> k <br /> IV._ Completion of Interstate 40 and installation of the Efland sewer line will promote <br /> ,_ ac the es l o in r Increases project <br /> activity may necesitateaditionalstaffngneedswithin the ext five years. No <br /> estimate s <br /> are available for this growth and the demands which will be created In <br /> terms of inspection services. II <br /> r;r; • <br /> 5;_.' <br /> CF' <br /> i <br /> rz <br /> 13 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.