Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-10-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 12-10-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 12:04:09 PM
Creation date
10/6/2016 11:38:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/1985
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> PAGE OF z9 <br /> r+ <br /> COUNTY OF ORANGE <br /> • <br /> 1985-86 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN - PARTS II - IV - - ' <br /> / _ e •„ / i • <br /> _ - i' J. DIVISION / ACCOUNT CODE <br /> - FUND :. / I3EPA'RTMENT <br /> . <br /> 1.A. For Change #3 <br /> - - 1) The Inspections Division Is approximately 80% self-supported=by fees • :-' <br /> - - - ._. collected from building-related permits. The Currcnt:fee schancee.wasthe -- <br /> -adopted in 19$1 . With projected reductions <br /> --: accompanying impact on the County budget, the fee schedule needs oo be_ _ <br /> } -. : ::evaluated to determine if the inspections i �ouldsreduce the amount of :�' <br /> a completely self-supporting basis. <br /> - General Fund appropriation necessary to sustain an enforcement-program+ <br /> -mandated by State action. The evaluationsosialsodnecesschedule ay eiable. <br /> - fees to be calculated by computer.rA consolidated t esis • . <br /> - - _ . _ desired'which. includes fees from inspections, planning• <br /> control ,functions.• <br /> _ 2) Yb_other alternatives have been considered as both Federal and State- _ <br /> • revenue sources may be:'-reduced, and local funding appears the only <br /> :providing for a self-supporting program. <br /> means of p _ <br /> .3) The proposed change would not affect other County•departments or services <br /> 4) The proposal is not part of a longer range proposal other than providing <br /> for periodic evaluation of fee schedules..' <br /> •' However, revenues mat <br /> 5) 'There would be no change in the.service indicators. <br /> _. - increase as a result of changes the thee Board oflComrnissione�s and no <br /> change would depend on the act ion <br /> ' estimate can be presented at this time <br /> b. 3) No changes would be•'requ�iredout b�increas#ngufees other related revenue increases brought about by <br /> . . permits. • <br /> •I.A. For Change #4 ��'_ <br /> 1 ge resulting from this work element is the continued • <br /> � .. 1) The only change <br /> reduction in the number past files <br /> tochnsure'thatball' closed have <br /> This work element must 'be P <br /> been performed for permits issued. <br /> 2) Another alternative-for completion of this-work element would be to hire <br /> a part-time Inspector on a one shot basis. <br /> The Inspector would complete <br /> closing out past files, then terminate employment. .5'ebaalternative-of <br /> e fact <br /> having •the current staff complete tta�sthe time the permits were issued <br /> was present current staff p of the job <br /> that the fu the location J <br /> and have familiarity with the work completed, <br /> C <br /> site and what work remains to be done. <br /> 3) No affects on other County departments are anticipated. <br /> 7. • • <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.