Orange County NC Website
. , <br /> 1 0 0 Of 31'3 <br /> , • . , <br /> PAGE 3 0F29 <br /> . . <br /> ' COUNTY OF ORANGE <br /> 1985-86 ANNUAL SERVICE PLAN - PARTS II - IV - . <br /> , • <br /> - , <br /> RP PPA1 / planning: Inspections / 0561 <br /> - <br /> —FUND / DEPARTMENT DIVISION / ACCOUNT CODE • <br /> , . <br /> I.A. For Change #1 - - . -: <br /> • -- -, - ; 1-)- The current Code Enforcement Officer I charged with inspecting building <br /> - • - :construction. is projected to-complete 2,340 inspections-in.the:1984-85-fiacal <br /> • • .. -,..:, year. This .is equivalent to 10 inspection per work day: Inipections are: .F.. - <br /> -. - ,... projected to increase by' 210 to 2,550 in 1985-86. This is:equivalent-to: - . <br /> 11 inspections-per work day. ": ..1:- :- . 7 ' ' " : - - <br /> . . * <br /> "- • -,- %': - Discounting travel time and time spent in the office answering citizen - <br /> - - • - end- contractor questions, the Code Enforcement Officer i 'spends.approximately <br /> 44 hours of each work day conducting inspections. For the current-year; this <br /> - -- allows an average of 28 minutes per !inspection when on-site. Projections <br /> for. 198546 indicate this 'time will decline slightly to 25 minutes. ::. • 1 <br /> • <br /> - : • It .is desirable to allow an average of 45-50 minutes on-site for-each - 1 <br /> - - insOectilon. This insures 'the Officer has adequate time-to-check ill facets.of <br /> construction and discuss corrections with contractors:-Based on this guide <br /> an.Officer could perform 7 inspections per day. <br /> . <br /> Hiring of a permanent, part-time Code Enforcement Officer I -to assist the - - <br /> . <br /> • - current Officer would distribute the workload more evenly and permit a <br /> thorough inspection to be made of each construction site,' Employment for <br /> 20 hours per week would -permit the assignment-of74 inspections per day to the <br /> new Officer.and allow the current employee to carry out 7. . <br /> 2). One alternative-explored was redistribution of the workload among all existing <br /> . Officers. This was not considered feasible since it would simply increasing- <br /> ' - the workload of others above their ability td handle. Two Officers: T - <br /> • <br /> • . . - are available to carry out a projected 2,636 electrical inspections (11/day) . <br /> plus assist the Officer in charge of plumbing/mechanical inspections <br /> - (1,978 inspections or 8/day)- The average for.all three Officers is slightly- <br /> more than 6 per day. <br /> n.... . . 3) The addition of a permanent, part-time Officer would not affect other --- <br /> Departments. <br /> ..,,,..- <br /> , . 4) The proposal Is not .part of a longer range plan other than upgrading the <br /> • . -. 'part-time position to full time as inspections increase and warrant the <br /> - change in status. <br /> • <br /> 5YAddition of the part-time Officer would reduce the workload of the current <br /> - Officer from if projected inspections per day to 7 per day. This would permit <br /> a more thorough inspection to be performed on each job site. <br /> . <br /> B. 0-Addition-of a part-time, permanent Code Enforcement Officer will influence the <br /> 1985-86 budget request as follows: • , . <br /> + 10,903 ,Persbneel Services <br /> ' 500 Operating Expenses . <br /> 4,265 Capital Outlay (. Vehicle.roffice furniture) . <br /> +.,15,668 Total Impact . <br /> ' ' . • <br /> C . <br />