Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
,__ ._ <br /> „ . . <br /> P . • „ <br /> ' •■ . <br /> — . <br /> 12 ... .. <br /> I, • K • ' <br /> n - <br /> , anything to <br /> • se noted that. do with L-40 should bac <br /> high prior it . <br /> Margison had concerns as followsr <br /> . <br /> 1) Water/Sewer extension policy . • , , . <br /> - 21, Prezoning <br /> , . <br /> . . . <br /> , 31 Thoroughfare plan <br /> 4) • . <br /> Gordon noted. that one thing she- felt that the Board <br /> should be very clear about was the concept of what. <br /> Orange County should *look like in the future.- <br /> - she was, especially interested in seeing. i-40 area • <br /> t.* ' plans. . <br /> She felt the next thing that was needed was to <br /> e . provide the infrastructure- to support this <br /> ,s. development and coordinate efforts for a <br /> ,, • <br /> water/sewer extension policy and, a thoroughfare- <br /> • plan.- <br /> . <br /> - . She also expressed a. desire for standards <br /> regarding industrial/commercial development and <br /> location. . . <br /> . ' <br /> Another concern was the revision of the Waning <br /> Ordinance in regards to planned developments and <br /> . • special use permits. <br /> Discussion' on the preservation of farm land <br /> i followed. <br /> ' . <br /> . , <br /> Pilkey noted that nothing was mentioned under the <br /> long range concerns about the preservation of <br /> farmland. 1 <br /> Gordon commented that prime farmland needed to be <br /> - . preserved for future growth. <br /> riser also noted that all around the world there <br /> seems to be a temporary excess in the supply of 1 <br /> , <br /> food and that in the future this will perhaps not <br /> ' . be so. Thus, preservation of farmland is still an <br /> 4 ' important issue. <br /> -. • ,.' <br /> - L <br /> -. Agenda Item *10 <br /> Planning: Staff Work Program. 1985-86 <br /> 1 - ------- <br /> 1 <br />