Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
V - <br /> rD <br /> V <br /> 10 See Green, Functions of the Zoning Board of <br /> Adjustment 15-24 (Xnstitute of Government, 1974). <br /> 11 While a variance is granted in the dis- <br /> cretion of the board, that discretion cannot be 4 <br /> exercised arbitrarily. <br /> 12 While not usually necessary for purposes of <br /> judicial review, it is also good practice to <br /> include in written decision a statement of the <br /> "conditions subsequent" imposed on the successful <br /> variance or special-use applicant -- i.e. , a list <br /> of those additional requirements imposed by the <br /> board (over and above those specified in the <br /> ordinance) in order to safeguard the public health, <br /> safety, and welfare, <br /> 13 N,C. Can, Stat. § 150A-36. <br /> 14 284 N.C. 458, 470, 202 S.E.2d 129 (1974). <br /> 15 Refining Co. V. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. <br /> 458, 468, 202 S,E.2d 129, 138 (1974), See the <br /> memorandum on The Board of Adjustment Part 2, <br /> Taking Evidence, dated. <br /> 16 Harden v. Raleigh, 192 N.C. 395, 135 S.E. <br /> 151 (1906). <br /> 17 5ee Green, op. cit. supra note 10 at 4, <br /> 18 See, e.g., James v. Sutton 229 N.C. 515, 50 <br /> S.E.2d 300 (1948). <br /> 1110 19 MacPherson v. City of Asheville, 283 N,C. <br /> 299, 307, 196 S,E.2d 200, 206 (1973). <br /> 20 This is a requirement under the Admin- <br /> istrative Procedure Act, N.C. Cen. Stat, § 150A- <br /> 37(b). <br /> 21 Anderson, American Law of Zoning, § 16.49 <br /> Record of Vote, (1968). <br /> N.C. Gen. Stat, § 153A-29(b). <br /> 1110 <br />