Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-07-1981
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1981
>
Agenda - 07-07-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2016 8:51:04 AM
Creation date
10/5/2016 8:50:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/7/1981
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Calvin P±eford: Co-owner of one of the commercial properties. He felt <br /> Hillsborough Township he had the right to use the property as it is and noted <br /> they had taken measures to buffer it near the residential <br /> property. <br /> Question (Willhoit) : What measures do you have to get rid of wastewater? <br /> Response: The structure is not yet finished. That particular _ <br /> parcel will perk and they have a health permit for a <br /> septic tank. <br /> Question (Lansford): What about the impact of traffic in the area due to these <br /> commercial activities? <br /> Response: These are existing structures. My problem will be trying <br /> to re-sell the property when it is not easily convertible <br /> to residential use. <br /> Alois Callemyn: If land will not perk what other use is there for it but <br /> Hillsborough Township commercial or industrial.. If its commercial use is not <br /> allowed, tax base will be lost. One major commercial neec <br /> is storage. <br /> Commissioner Barnes: Identified some mail items for the public hearing: <br /> 1) Letter from Nello Titer regarding the non-conforming <br /> use designation of their asphalt plant in Bingham <br /> Township. <br /> 2) Citation of letters both in support of and in oppositi <br /> to the AR zoning in Bingham Township. <br /> COMMENTS ON THE ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT. <br /> No comments on individual articles. _ <br /> Josephine Barbour: Are you accepting written comments and for how long? <br /> Eno Township <br /> Response (Crawford): It depends on the action taken by the Planning Board <br /> tonight. <br /> • <br /> Josephine Barbour: Has the Planning Board considered a cost-benefit analysis <br /> of the ordinance? How much value is lost with constrained <br /> land? Will the County automatically reduce the value of <br /> these restricted parcels? She indicated that environmenta <br /> impact studies should be done for each PID area. <br /> Stanley Bennett: The Zoning Ordinance can have promoting effects on propert <br /> Chapel Hill 'Ibwnship values as well as negRting effects. He felt the general <br /> effect of the ordinance is to protect land value. <br /> Barry Jacobs:: Why were some of the townships excluded? <br /> Cheeks Township <br /> Response (Crawford) : Political pressure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.