Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-01-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 12-01-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2016 2:21:28 PM
Creation date
10/4/2016 4:30:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/1/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
awareness that alterations must be made in services are <br /> intergovernmental is increasing lic water and wastewater <br /> to be in aelim lysh�nomica manner that supports local land use <br /> and provided in a ment plans, and growth management efforts. Three <br /> gen economic wa a development P establishing <br /> eneral water supply management approaches have been discussed by the <br /> 9 <br /> maintaining the status quo; and (3) <br /> Committee. These include: (1)management of raw water resources;supplies and/or <br /> a new Oohing department ntideerauthority for management. of water <br /> establishing !'� <br /> treatment facilities. <br /> Comments on Count ide Authorit A roach <br /> Committee discussions of the three approaches, the County-wide <br /> authority i Comm appears to be the preferred alternative. Itoffers a <br /> authority approach appe but not limited to: <br /> number of advantages over other alternatives, including, <br /> optimal utilization of regional water supplies and treatment <br /> 1. more o P <br /> facilities. <br /> equitable treatment of customers, through implementation of a <br /> 2. More eq <br /> system-wide rate making methodology that is based on the cost of <br /> providing service to each class of customers. <br /> representation of customers by structuring <br /> 3, Opportunity for fair rep to reflect various areas served. <br /> g overning board of authority <br /> 4. Significant economies of scale in improvements management, thereby permitting construction <br /> financing and facility operation and Y utilization of resources not economically feasible under an individual <br /> approach. - <br /> it to adapt to changing regulatory environment and meet <br /> S. Greater abil y <br /> required treatment standards. all water <br /> 6. Also offers a structure for consolidating and coordinating <br /> supply and treatment and wastewater collection and treatment <br /> management functions within the County. <br /> laruiing and management effar`,s <br /> 7. Improved coordination of water resources planning in' surrounding <br /> with State and Federal agencies and local g <br /> counties. . <br /> 8. Better utilization of technical and administrative s <br /> sff, resources <br /> required for proper system operation <br /> wide authority approach are reported <br /> The primary disadvantages of a County <br /> to be: (1) it would be politically difficult to implement; (2) loss of local <br /> and (3) <br /> government's influence over water and d sewer <br /> w initiating utility decisiOn <br /> na making; <br /> g, <br /> S��ate approval would be required pr. <br /> P <br /> made <br /> roceedings for new.. reservoir projects. This alternative governing beara of the <br /> politically acceptable if the representation on the <br /> . authority is properly structured and "branch" offices are established for <br /> ) primary service areas within the County. <br /> 20 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.