Orange County NC Website
Proposal 1 - Submitted by Chris Best, 16 November 1987 <br /> LONG RANGE WATER STRATEGY <br /> An Analysis: <br /> The Long Range Water Management Committee was formed, ',and their <br /> charge outlined, by the Orange County Commissioners in the early spring <br /> of 1987. Orange County has taken an interest in providing water and <br /> d <br /> sewer services in the Efland-Cheeks area. It has <br /> shown interest and most <br /> helping provide water to the Meadowlands industrial <br /> importantly it has shown, through this committee, that it is concerned <br /> with planning for future water needs for all residents. The charge given <br /> the committee was clear: study the short term needs for water use in the <br /> County and its municipalities including transfer options, their sources and <br /> costs; engaging long-term planning, discussion of the limits of growth, <br /> definition of service areas, and making recommendations as to where the <br /> water will come from, how to pay for it, and how to use it wisely. <br /> The committee has discussed all of the above at length, and its <br /> recent passion has been to provide an organizational model, possibly a new <br /> arm of government, that will look after the long range water Re s of <br /> oche <br /> County. Members have focused on the recommendation of the <br /> Site Committee, and the organizational models have revolved around who <br /> will use, and who will pay. <br /> There is still no consensus that a reservior is needed for the future <br /> if service district boundaries are limited and regional water sources are <br /> explored further, but it is clear, when a new reservior site is discussed, <br /> that the County cannot be expected to participate hr in <br /> water systems. without <br /> the full cooperation of the municipalities a <br /> County should remain firm in this intent. <br /> There have been several organizational/management strategies <br /> discussed at the meetings. Some of those discussed extensively are: A) a <br /> County-wide Authority, B) a County Water and Sewer Department, <br /> the County as a raw water supplier. Both A and B have been recommended, <br /> and another alternative not extensively discussed, that of maintaining <br /> "status quo," has also been put forth. <br /> In an attempt to follow the committee's charge as well as face the <br /> difficulties of coordinating such entities as Hillsborough, OWASA, and <br /> OAWS with the County's efforts, the interim recommendation Each <br /> involve a blending of at least three of the proposed strategies. <br /> strategy slowly evolving into another. This continuous joint planning will <br /> 16- <br />