Orange County NC Website
FINDINGS AND RPCO }4ENDAT IONS <br /> The Long Range Water Management Strategy Committee <br /> attempted to reach conclusions in three general areas, <br /> findings of fact, policy concepts, and specific policy <br /> recommendations. Factual statements generated little <br /> disagreement. It was not disputed that Orange-Alamance and <br /> Hillsborough will face demand deficits in the near term or <br /> that neither system possesses the financial means necessary <br /> to establish its own new long term source. This only <br /> translated, though, into partial agreement on the <br /> philosophical statements that must be the foundation for any <br /> coherent and functional policy. <br /> The Committee agreed that the establishment of a county- <br /> wide water and sewer entity offered many benefits in helping <br /> to address the long range water need of Orange County. The <br /> benefits include; a greater capability to respond to new <br /> Federal water and wastewater treatment requirements; greater <br /> resources and flexibility to finance and construct a new <br /> reservoir or other new water supply ; improved rate equity and <br /> representation for water and sewer customers; and the <br /> economies of scale that come with a consolidated management <br /> and planning system. For these reasons, the Committee <br /> concluded that the benefits of a consolidated water and sewer <br /> entity are desirable. General consensus was, that, in terms <br /> of management, the status quo was unacceptable in the long <br /> run. Additionally, while agreement is not universal , the <br /> Committee leans towards a new reservoir in Orange County as <br /> the best long term source, with a Jordan Lake allocation <br /> being pursued as a parallel option. <br /> The Committee recognized, however, that political , <br /> equity, management control , and other concerns exist today <br /> that make the establishment of a county-wide authority or <br /> other entity infeasible In the near future. With these <br /> concerns in mind, the Committee concluded that an incremental <br /> or graduated approach to achieving long range goals is the <br /> preferable way to proceed. Through an incremental approach to <br /> addressing the County' s water need, the Committee believed <br /> that any obstacles to a comprehensive approach that exist <br /> today could be overcome. <br /> The Committee, thus, recommends the creation of a County <br /> Water Board as the first step towards meeting the long range <br /> water needs of Orange County. <br /> This Board should consist of seven members. One each <br /> should represent Chapel Hill , Carrboro, Hillsborough, and the <br /> Orange-Alamance Water System. The remaining three are to be <br /> chosen at large. Agreement could not be reached on whether <br /> specific administrative enforcement powers should be granted <br /> to the Board. This lack of enforcement power is of concern to <br /> some Committee members. Therefore, the members of the County <br /> Water Board must be as accountable as possible to their <br /> respective constituencies if their recommendations are to <br /> translate into action. While the County Commissioners should <br /> be responsible for appointments to the Board, the <br />