Orange County NC Website
047 <br /> Article 8.2 .2 states that where a preponderance of evidence indicates <br /> compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the <br /> specific use, and that the use complies with all required regulations <br /> and standards, the application must be approved unless it is found. in <br /> some specific manner, that: <br /> 1 . The use will not promote the public health. safety and <br /> general welfare if located where proposed and developed and <br /> operated according to the plan as submitted; <br /> 2 . The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous <br /> property; <br /> 3 . The use is not in compliance with the general plans for the <br /> physical development of the county as embodied in these <br /> regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, <br /> adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. <br /> The burden of proving one or more of the above findings is on those <br /> opposing the application. The proof must also be in the form of <br /> competent material and substantial evidence. <br /> No information has been received which would establish grounds for <br /> making one or more of the above findings. <br /> The Planning Staff has reviewed the application. the site plan and all <br /> supporting documentation and has found that the applicant does comply <br /> with the general standards. specific rules. and required regulations <br /> with the exception of minimum gross land area requirements and the <br /> underground utilities requirement. <br /> Section 7 .3 of the Zoning Ordinance permits the Board of Commissioners <br /> to make modifications of the regulations in a particular case where the <br /> Board makes findings that public purposes are satisfied to an <br /> equivalent or greater degree by the actions, designs or solutions <br /> proposed by the applicant. Rather than considering a modification, the <br /> Planning Staff has recommended to the applicant that the request be <br /> amended from a PD-I-3 to a PD-I-1 designation. The findings of fact <br /> provided by the Staff have indicated that the proposed use complies <br /> with the requirements of the PD-I-1 district. The applicant will <br /> indicate whether or not he is willing to accept the PD-I-1 <br /> classification at the public hearing. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval with the amendment of the <br /> district designation from PD-I-3 to PD-I-1 and with the attachment of <br /> of the following conditions: <br /> 1 . The grantee of this Special Use Permit shall post with Orange <br /> County. in a form acceptable to the County Attorney. a bond <br /> or letter of credit in an amount equal to the cost of all <br /> improvements plus 10% . The amount shall be determined on the <br /> basis of fully executed construction contracts or certifica- <br /> tion by a registered engineer employed by the grantee of this <br /> Special Use Permit. As improvements are completed a <br /> corresponding amount of money may be released from the <br />