Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-23-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 11-23-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2016 2:07:24 PM
Creation date
10/4/2016 4:21:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/23/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br /> 192 <br /> - - .s • • .1 ft- <br /> shall also be calc <br /> schogl crossj.ngs are to be used/ pedestriAn <br /> volumes shall_be assigned to each_ crssing, Any, <br /> characteristics of the site that will cause <br /> • -tioi •roblems sh.11 ' - <br /> noted. <br /> (e) ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT <br /> t - • . _ • - _ t.• 1 - - - - • <br /> construction of the-proposed. development shall <br /> be calculated. This demand shall consist of the. <br /> combination of the existing traffic and traffic <br /> generated by the proposed development. It <br /> staging_ of the proposed develn ment_ is <br /> completion shall be made. This analysis shall be. <br /> performed during the peak highway hour(s) and <br /> peak development--generated hour(s) for all. <br /> roadways and major intersections in the study <br /> area. Volume/capacity calculations shall be. <br /> completed for all major intersections. It is <br /> usually at these locations that capacity is most <br /> restricted_ <br /> - - - S• 1 1.. •- • - • t . • - . • 1 • .. 1 - <br /> be examined as to the feasibility of Installing <br /> traffic signals. This evaluation shall compare, <br /> the projected traffic and pedestrian_ volumes to <br /> the warrants for traffic signal installation. <br /> (f) 4oD .1_ • 4 _ op . D .• i• . . ...._. <br /> Levels of service for all roadways and intersec <br /> ti9ns shall be listed. All roadways and/or <br /> intersections showing a level of service below C <br /> shall be considered deficient. aad specific. <br /> recommendations for the elimination of these <br /> problems_ shall be listed, Thj.s listing of. <br /> recommended Improvements shall include, but not <br /> be limited to the following elements: internal <br /> circulation design, site access location and <br /> deign. elcternal roadwy and intersection design <br /> and _improvements, traffic signal installation <br /> and operation including signal timing. and <br /> transit design_ imprQyementp. p1l physical. <br /> - • - { - . - - 1.- . - 0_40 1 1 <br /> The listing of recommended improvements for road <br /> improvements shall include for each improvement. <br /> the party usponsj.ble for the improvement, thg <br /> cost and funding of thg improvement. and t <br /> • t • • 1. . . _ . 1.- •r• -31- t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.