Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
r <br /> 170 <br /> 5 <br /> rates, to be used for this calculation shall be. <br /> ohtaineJ from an accen±ed source such as the <br /> Transportation and Traffic Fn...i niter i na Handbook, <br /> Institute of Transportation Engineers . These. <br /> development-generated traffic movements as <br /> estimsteP2 and to e( s ) and <br /> Methodology followed shall be documented . All <br /> turning movements shall be calculated . These <br /> generated yolumes shall be distributed to th . <br /> study Brea and assigned to the existing roadways. <br /> and intersections, throughout the study area. <br /> Documentation of ell assumptions used in the. <br /> distribution and assignment phase shall be pro- <br /> vilied. Traffic volumes shall be assigned to <br /> individual access points . Pedestr inl1. .YQlLLm- <br /> 1 <br /> I . • a - - - 1 ■ ■ . ■ - <br /> school crossings are to be used_, pedestrian <br /> ■ O • . 1 - . • - 1 • 1 • 11 <br /> characteristics of the site that will cause <br /> particular trip generation problems shall be <br /> noted .. <br /> e) ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT . <br /> The total traffic demand that will result front <br /> construction of the proposed development shall <br /> be calculated. This demand shall consist of the. <br /> combination of the existing traffic and traffic. <br /> • - 1 - _ - 4 . 1 - b • • • . 4 - - • . I1 - 1 <br /> _ • • 1 • . 1 - . • • • - . . - - • . 0 - 1 <br /> anticipated, calculetierL for each sta of <br /> completion shell be made. This Analysis shall be, <br /> g - • ( - • I • I . I - . - . 1 • • 1 , . i • . -' I ° <br /> peak development-generated hour ( s ) for all. <br /> • . 1 . . . A 1 u - •• - 1 — — ■ 1 ' I A — t • <br /> area . Vo I upre/_cepaci ty cal cu I at i ons shall be. <br /> completed for all major intersections . It is <br /> usually at these Iocetlofs that capacity is most. <br /> restricted, <br /> elles_tr i.aB crossing$ sha I .L <br /> be examined as to the feasibility of i nstal l i ng <br /> traffic signals . This evaluation shell compare <br /> the projected traffic and pedestrian volumes to <br /> thin warrants for traffic signal installation . <br /> f ) CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS <br /> Levels of service for all roadways and intersec- <br /> tions shall be I i sted , A l l roadways and/or <br /> intersections sbgwing a level of service below C <br /> I . • - • , - a — — a • - . - 1 . 1 ° . - <br /> ,reccmmendations for the elimination of these. <br /> problems shall be listed . This listing of <br />