Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit seconded by Commissioner <br /> 4 <br /> Halkiotis to approve the Administration and Planning Board recommendation. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 2a. ADVERTISEMENT FOR THE NOVEMBER 23 1987 JOINT PUBLIC HEARING <br /> Marvin presented for consideration of approval the legal notice <br /> for the public hearing on November 23, 1987. <br /> Chair Marshall noted that one <br /> ment is that, without background informatione for nthepit items listed,Teitisis <br /> difficult to ascertain if the correct wording, has been used and if the <br /> item is ready for public hearing. She asked that background information <br /> be distributed for all items that deal with policy or a change in the <br /> Ordinance. <br /> Marvin Collins agreed to comply with this request. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Chair Marshall <br /> to approve the advertisement for the November 23, 1987 Joint Public <br /> Hearing as presented by the Planning Director. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 3 . PINEY MOUNTAIN - REVISED APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAN <br /> Collins presented for consideration a revision to the <br /> plan approval of Piney Mountain, a cluster subdivision located on Mt. <br /> Sinai Road. <br /> On August 18 the Board of County Commissioners a <br /> liminary plan for Piney Mountain Cluster Subdivision subject totheleven <br /> conditions. Among the conditions were the following: <br /> (4) Provide a left turn lane off Mt. Sinai Road with the final <br /> approval of Phase One. <br /> The applicant has requested that condition #4 be deleted from the <br /> approval. The Department of Transportation changed its recommendation and <br /> has said that the left turn lane on Mt. Sinai Road is no longer needed. <br /> and <br /> recommends Administration osupports the position of the Planning Board <br /> liminary plan for Piney Mountain4ClusteroSubdivisione approval of the pre- <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell seconded by Commissioner <br /> Carey to approve the Administration and Planning Board recommendation. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 4. SUBDIVISION REGULATION AMENDMENT <br /> STREETS SECTION IV-B-3-c-8 MARGINAL <br /> Collins presented for consideration a <br /> Section IV-B-3-c- 8 of the Subdivision Regulations. Theenpropt to <br /> amendment would specify forms of common or restricted access to lots in <br /> new subdivisions along major roads. proposed <br /> more control over the number of access points ecreated nalong major roads, <br /> thereby reducing conflicts between through traffic and turning vehicles. <br /> The Planning Board voiced two concerns and recommended that the pro- <br /> posed amendment be referred back to the Ordinance Review Committee for <br /> further consideration. <br /> The Administration concurs with the Planning Board recommendation. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell seconded by Commissioner <br /> Carey to approve the Administration and Planning Board recommendation. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 5. SUBDIVISION REGULATION AMENDMENT - SECTION IV-B-3-c-10 DRIVEWAYS <br /> Marvin Collins presented for consideration a proposed amendment <br /> to Section IV-B-3-c-10 in the Subdivision Regulations. This Section is <br /> a <br />