Orange County NC Website
11) 1 '[ 1 If <br /> 1 5n <br /> 18 <br /> THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMMENTS AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. . <br /> Motion was _made by Commissioner Hartwell , seconded by Commissioner <br /> Halklotis to refer this item to the Planning Board with a recommendation <br /> for consideration to be presented to the Board of Commissioners on October <br /> 5, 1967. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> b. Article 6. 16.6 - Home Occupations (Rural Buffer) <br /> Article 6.23.4 - Impervious Surface Ratios (RB) <br /> Article 7.2. 1 - PD Districts (RE) <br /> Article 9.11 - Permitted Signs (RB) <br /> Article 12. 10 - Landscaping/Screening (RB) <br /> Greg Szymik stated the purpose of these amendments would be to <br /> complete the references in the Zoning Ordinance to the new Rural Buffer <br /> zoning district which was created in January, 1987. These amendments <br /> would add Rural Buffer to these sections and does not constitute a <br /> substance change in the way the land zone classification would be handled. <br /> THERE WERE NO COMMENTS AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Willholt, seconded by <br /> Commissioner Hartwell to refer this item to the Planning Board with a <br /> recommendation for consideration to be presented to the Board of <br /> Commissioners on October 5, 1987. <br /> VOTE: . UNANIMOUS. <br /> Greg Szymik stated that on March 24, 1987 the Board of <br /> Commissioners adopted regulations to clarify when the amendments went into <br /> effect. At that time it was questioned how subdivision applications that <br /> were received by the County during the suspended period would be treated. <br /> This Section would be amended by adding an effective date of March 24, <br /> 1987. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell , seconded by <br /> Commissioner Halkiotis to refer this item to the Planning Board with a <br /> recommendation to be presented to the Board of Commissioners on October 5, <br /> 1987. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> Greg Szymik explained that Section V identifies the forms <br /> of security that may be used to guarantee construction of required <br /> improvements in approved subdivisions. The amendment would delete cash as .._ <br /> an acceptable form of security and add escrow agreements as a new form of <br /> security for required improvements. _ <br /> Commissioner HMotiotis refer this <br /> wato rCitemssioneheHartwell, seconded by <br /> recommendation to be presented to the Board of oBon a <br /> 1967. _ _ <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS. - <br /> 0 t�__ Ratan) 1Y-84l_tra_t`a czla=l_hazall_ttz8giE_ihmeaJj.Lbd _hex <br /> Sett-i.on-IA=5-t-U__a- v> „s <br /> Greg Szymik explained that Section IV-B-3-c-8 of the Subdivision <br /> Regulations is proposed to be amended by specifying forms of common or <br /> restricted access to lots in new subdivisions along major streets. <br />