Agenda - 10-20-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

I . ":.-•. .:- . . ...., area. Opposition to locating Day Care in the Cafeteria building was also voiced; reasons were that the Mental Health Center has money for locating 076 a day hospital there as well as this building (the cafeteria) being a possible site for the Willie M. program. Ms. Pattie Paddock, Director of the Cammunity Sdiool for People Under Six (hereafter referred to as Day Care), told the Board that locating the day care facility in the Cafetria was attractive to them. But they had no money for the renovation or the move. She added a _concern was also a lack of permanency for li,,7,4toi, ?:.15;: ir,* Day Carespace. ... . . . Cammissioner Wilihoit said that on March 1st the Board would &emulate what would go to public hearing. Instructions to the Manager were to delete the driver-'s license office. The Board set March 16, 1982, at 7:30 P.M.- in the Nutrition Roam at the Northside Multipurpose for a public hearing on the space allocation of the site. 4. Eno River State Park Measure Plan: Mr. Don Cax, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors for the Orange Soil and Water Conservation District, presented this Plan to the Board. He stated the history of the Eno River Park and said this was _ for the development of the Cates For area only in accordance with the RC & D program. Be said there was no land acquisition involved, no local funding requested and Orange County was being asked to sign the contract as one of the Sponsors of . ... . the Park.:. _ . _____________ Mt. Stuart Barbour, representing the Eno River Group, asked the Board of Commissioners to withhold approval of this Plan and to delay any action for sixty days to permit the Eno River Group time to study the Plan and prepare a list of questions for submission. Mr. Barbour said this is a waste of taxpayer's money and asked the Board to say no to the spending of tax money. MS. Sandy Williamson;. representing the Eno River Association, said mr. Barb 'a concerns have no relation to the document the Board was being asked to approve. She said there is no land acquisition involved and this pertains only to the develop- ment of one section. She added the community had been consulted as well as a study of the archaeology of the site completed. The goal is to preserve and protect the Park with access for the public. 1 - , Mt. Cox Qnid the environmental impact assessment had been widely circulated for this site and at that time he had answered a long list of questions.submitted by Mr. Barbour. Mere will be no negative environmental impact. -. , .... .- , .-.