Agenda - 10-05-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

D °M X187 3 Input from the Sheriff 's Department and the Emergency Management Services Department before making a decision on this item. Chair Marshall indicated that there are several questions that mast be answered before a decision will be made. Chair Marshall and Commissioner Halkiotis asked for additional information on the grid system used in the assignment of these house numbers. • ,iIIlmuBl mas , 210 Hideaway Drive concurred with his neighbors and questioned the feasibility of integrating the house numbers with the zip code resulting in a nine digit number which would then indicate their position on the grid system. He felt such a system would satisfy the postal authorities, the emergency services and the property owner. RILL_JillICULHE Fails of New Hope Subdivision, Indicated there Is not a consistent numbering system in place but that everyone chose their own numbers. He asked if the grid system sufficiently provided for infill and Marshall Indicated that the grid system does provide sufficient space for growth and that those numbers assigned would be permanent numbers. WITH NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. The staff -was requested to provide more detailed information and a recommendation. 2.._LAK_US.E_ELAU_AMEN.QMEUIE_ LUE=L-$Z_CUAN.QLEl3-CQI�CEEIE_COMEAta The Staff presentation was made by Planner Gene Bell . He stated that on October 10, 1985 Chandler Concrete Company was granted a secondary Land Use Plan amendment, Planned Development rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit for 1 .41 acres of land on Old NC Highway 10. The request was prompted by State mandated requirements to contain runoff from the existing concrete plant. Count �s a An adjoining property owner subsequently challenged Orange Y pproval in court. On December 12, 1985, the court ruled that the Special Use Permit was invalid since the applicant did not meet the required two acre minimum lot size standard, and since evidence had not been presented the project would maintain the value of existing properties in the _ area. The affect of the court ruling was to place Chandler Concrete Company in violation of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. To correct its nonconforming s Chandler Concrete 1s requesting that the Ten Year Transition sareaand Commercial Industrial Activity node be expanded by an additional 0.59 acres. Combined with the 1 .41 acres currently in the same designation, the .two—acre lot size requirement could be met. If the proposed Land Use Plan amendment is -approved, Chandler Concrete Company would submit a Planned Development application for the entire two acres. Current-,- policy does not permit Land - Use Plan amendment and Planned Development- (or- rezoning) - applications to be handled concurrently. _ The • procedures for amending the Land Use. Plan states three reasons for which the Plan may be amended: - (1 ) because of changed or changing conditions in a particular area or areas of the County; - _ (2) to correct an error or an omission in the Plan; or (3) in response to a change in land use policy.. The plan amendment application does not adequately address any of these reasons.