Orange County NC Website
345 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY Action Agenda <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Item No. 21 <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> MEETING DATE October 5, 1987 <br /> Subject: FORMATION OF AND CHARGE TO SHORT-LIVED FACT FINDING COMMITTEE ON EQUITY FUNDING <br /> • <br /> Department: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Public Hearing: Yes X no <br /> Attachments: Tnformation Contact: <br /> NONE Shirley E. Marshall <br /> Phone Numbers: 732-8181, 968-4501, <br /> 227-0231 <br /> PURPOSE: To create a short-lived, narrowly-focused fact-finding working group to: <br /> 1 . first define and then to explicate "equity" as proposed in the <br /> School Merger report; <br /> 2. to identify the questions that are being raised about "equity" within the <br /> official school community: the Boards, the Administrations and the <br /> teachers; <br /> 3. to describe the Orange County career ladder pilot program: its present <br /> impact on salaries, as well as future impacts both should the program <br /> be adopted statewide and should it be scrapped. <br /> BACKGROUND: The County Commissioners created the School Merger Task Force in response <br /> to our observations that: <br /> 1 . the amount of money available to the Chapel Hill-Carrboro schools would, <br /> in the immediate future, be larger than the amount provided to each <br /> school system by the per capita allocation; and <br /> 2. the uneven distribution of the taxbase no longer made the choice of sup- <br /> plemental support for the school systems an equal choice for taxpayers <br /> of the separate systems. (At present, a 2 tax on each $100 valuation <br /> would need to be paid by taxpayers in the Orange County School District <br /> to raise the same number of dollars that taxpayers in the Chapel Hill- <br /> Carrboro schools can raise by a 1 tax on each $100 valuation. ) <br /> The report of the School Merger Task Force recommended that merger not be pursued <br /> at this time. It is my sense that the county community and all three Boards agree with <br /> that conclusion. In addition, I do not sense that either the community nor any Board <br /> wants to pursue merger unless and until the General Assembly refuses any longer to fund <br /> more than one system in a county. <br /> The Merger Task Force did, however, in the strongest possible terms, ask us to <br /> address some other issues - among them equalizing the funding in the two school systems <br /> in the terms of long standing state funding policy. The appropriate time to address <br /> financial policy is during the budget process, a statement I made on accepting the <br /> report. <br />