Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-05-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 10-05-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2016 2:07:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2016 3:14:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/5/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING WARD <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: Z-4-87 AUTOWERKS <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING BOARD <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS : <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" indicates Noncompliance <br /> PLANNING BOARD BOARD <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON 01= <br /> SUBMITTED APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS COMMISSIONERS <br /> Ordinance Requi cements FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements speci- <br /> fied in .Articie 20 - Amend- <br /> ments. Those requirements <br /> include : <br /> 20. 32 a) Map showing affected X Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No <br /> property at scale of not less 1"=60' <br /> than 1 '= 100" nor more than l '= <br /> 20' <br /> 20. 3.2 b) Legal description of X Yes No Description provided with application Yes No <br /> property <br /> 20. 3.2 c) Explanation of alleged X Yes No An error in the zoning atlas is Yes No <br /> error, i f any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment alleged since this property was not <br /> zoned EC-5 in 1983 <br /> 20. 3.2 d) Changed conditions , if Yes No Changed Applicant Ind.icates that site is Yes No <br /> any , which mare amendment reasona- conditions adjacent to property being used for <br /> bly necessary to promote public not alleged.a power transition line to the. south <br /> health , safety and general welfare. and a previous pig farm to then orth. <br /> 20. 3.2 e) Manner in which proposed X Yes No This area is designated Rural-Residen- Yes No <br /> amendment will carry out purpose tial . Applicant indicates the amend- <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive ment would be in compliance with the <br /> Land Use Plan which contemplated EC-5 -+ <br /> Plan. zoning for commercial uses in 1981 . W <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.