Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
O R A N G E C O U N T Y 163 <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date October 5, 1987 <br /> Action/ gsnda <br /> Item #V (s _ <br /> SUBJECT: Z-4-87 AUTOWERKS <br /> ACTION BY: No time limit <br /> DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING _Yes _x__ No <br /> ATTACHMENT(S ) : INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Kirk <br /> Application <br /> Project Summary <br /> Vicinity Map <br /> Agency Comments <br /> Certificate of Mailing <br /> Findings of Fact <br /> 8-24-87 Public Hearing Minutes <br /> 9-21 -87 Planning Board Minutes <br /> TELEPHONE NUMBERS : <br /> Hillsborough - 732-8181 ' <br /> Durham - 688-7331 <br /> Mebane - 227-2031 <br /> Chapel Hill - 968-4501 <br /> PURPOSE : Consideration of a proposed request by Charles Miller and <br /> Merle Dancy to amend the Orange County Zoning Atlas . This <br /> item was presented at public hearing on August 24, 1987 . <br /> BACKGROUND: The property in question is located on the east side of N. C. <br /> Highway 86 north of New Hope Church Road (SR 1723) and south <br /> of Old N. C. 10 . The applicants, Charles Miller and Merle <br /> Dancy, are requesting a rezoning on a portion of lot 1 of <br /> Tax Map 2 - Chapel Hill Township . The property that would be <br /> rezoned contains 41 , 480 square feet or 0 .95 acres . The <br /> current zoning on the property is Rural Residential (R 1 ) . <br /> The proposed zoning is Existing Commercial (EC-5 ) . The <br /> property is the present site of the Autowerks auto repair <br /> garage. <br /> The area is designated as Rural Residential in the Land Use <br /> Plan . The applicants maintain that the existing use was in <br /> operation in 1981 when Hillsborough Township was zoned and <br /> that an error was made at that time. The property was zoned <br /> R-1 and should have been designated Existing Commercial <br /> (EC-5 ) . <br /> The County Attorney has responded to two questions posed at <br /> the public hearing . The first was whether zoning the parcel <br /> to EC-5 would constitute spot zoning . His response is that <br />