Agenda - 10-05-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

IIMII-13 Mr. Rhine and Mr. Chandler should not be considered as evidence in this public hearing. Commissioner Willholt questioned why the original request was not for the full 2 acres as required. Gledhill stated that he had advised the Board to waive the 2 acre minimum lot size. Since there Is an expressed reduction provision in the Ordinance of 10%, a further reduction through a general provision was not allowed. The 1 .41 acres was determined to be the minimum amount of land on which to build the three continued that he knew of no provision In the Ordinance ponds. Gledhill Use Plan amendments to correct prior actions of the Board. permits Land Commissioner Hartwell asked If a Land Use Plan designation was necessary since the land on which the Chandler Plant is located is already included in the Land Use Plan with the right designation which totals more than the 2 acre minimum. Mr. Chandler explained that there were two tracts of land with two different zonings. The concrete plant itself is zoned 1-3 which is not the same as the property on which the ponds are located. Gledhill stated that by Including portions of the existing concrete plant in the 1-3 zone, a Land Use Plan amendment would not be necessary. The 1 .41 acres Is already properly zoned in the Land Use Plan designation. Joyce Garrett, Attorney for Chandler Concrete, spoke to inconsistencies In the minutes of prior public hearings about the location of the The permits for timbering and grading were secured and the ponds were paced in accordance with the directive from DEM. contributions that Chandler makes to the communit She ssube a nt al mount of ic money has been expended to meet and to protect against amount of environmental problem. It is the desire to keep the Pheentirl p located and asked that the request for an amendment to the sLand rUsehPlanabe granted. Marvin Collins clarified that no permit was needed for timbering and the permit Mr. Chandler received was for grading. Ms. Garrett acknowledged this correction. THERE BEING NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. A motion was made by Commissioner Willholt, seconded by Commissioner Carey to refer this item to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be considered by the Board of Commissioners on October 5. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. z..�ZQ INE_6IL61_6LlEUDEIEEIIE a....._Z =EZ Ihg_bi ;3d.Qx1nads. Planner Greg Szymik presented for the receipt of public proposed request by Meadowlands Associates to amend the OrangemmCounty Zoning' Atlas. The property is located along the south side of U. S Highway 70 Business east -of N.C. 86 In Hillsborough Township. The applicant is requesting a realignment of the existing(R-1 ) lzones, previously (stlb, . lished by the Board of Commissioners on Jul 1 , 1987. prevuopole oftthe change is to match zoning district boundaries with the The Master Plan land use designations. The property is located in an area d esignated as Ten Year Transition and Commercial industrial Activity Node in the Orange County Land Use Plan, The proposed realignment would result in the following difference in zones: Existing Proposed Zoning Realigned Zone Difference