Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-05-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 10-05-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2016 2:07:33 PM
Creation date
10/4/2016 3:14:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/5/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
378
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
089 D e <br /> Mr. Chandler noted that he had complied with all the requirements <br /> of the Conditional Use Permit before such time as the court overturned the <br /> decision. He added that since the time of the Court order he had talked <br /> with members of the community explaining to them the necessity of the <br /> retention ponds and the benefit of the reclamation activity which would be <br /> continued. In order for the property on which the reclamation ponds are <br /> situated to be properly zoned, he must add to It an additional .59 acres of <br /> land in order to meet the minimum two acre requirement. <br /> The purpose of the request for an amendment to the Land Use Plan <br /> is to redesignate .59 acre tract of land adjoining the concrete plant from <br /> Rural Residential to Ten-Year Transition Commercial Industrial Activity <br /> Node. If the Land Use Plan is amended, he will apply for rezoning and a <br /> Conditional Use Permit which will allow for a retention and recycling <br /> facility which is critical to the operation of the concrete plant , and does <br /> not constitute an extension of the commercial activity. <br /> Mr. . Chandler reemphasized that his original request for a Land <br /> Use Plan amendment was solely to meet DEM requirements for the control of <br /> runoff. He noted that it was late in 1984 when it was discovered that the <br /> runoff was an environmental problem. He continued that when the Land Use <br /> Plan was adopted in 1981 , the property line of the concrete plant was <br /> designated as the line separating Rural - Residential from Commercial . Based <br /> on the use at that time, such designation was both natural and reasonable. <br /> Based on technological advances and on Increased sensitivity to the <br /> environmental factor it has been determined that the runoff of surface water <br /> from the plant site i-s undesirable. The nature of the natural runoff is now <br /> believed, by the Department of Environmental Management, to be a hazard to <br /> public health, safety and welfare. Based on the standard for environmental <br /> control when the Land Use Plan was adopted, no detrimental effect was <br /> recognized. He noted that the newly recognized hazard presents a changed <br /> condition which should be the basis for a secondary amendment to the Land <br /> Use Plan. The granting of a secondary amendment will carry out the intent <br /> and purpose of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan by enabling continued <br /> operation of the commercial business in the area clearly designated for <br /> commercial use in the original Land Use Plan. Although it would be possible <br /> to prevent man-made situations which create runoff -into the stream, there is <br /> no remedy short of the propsed retention ponds which will prevent the <br /> natural runoff. He stated this was a changed condition over which he has no <br /> Control . The Planning Staff has recommended that the application for <br /> redesignation of .59 acres from Rural Residential to Ten-Year Transition <br /> Area and Commercial- Industrial Activity Node be denied. Mr. Chandler <br /> Indicated that his understanding of the basis of the recommendation was that <br /> he failed to adequately state the changed conditions on which he based his <br /> request for a secondary amendment and that a .59 acre tract does not, in <br /> Planning Staff 's opinion, at this time, meet certain location standards. He <br /> apologized if his explanation of the changed conditions were not <br /> sufficiently clear and noted that before today he was not aware that the <br /> application was considered deficient on that basis. He asked that the <br /> comments he made at this public hearing regarding changed conditions be <br /> - incorporated into the application so as to remove the deficiency. Regardin <br /> the location criteria, he noted the following. g <br /> One of the areas which was deficient was <br /> The plant has access to public water. The propertyicannotvbeesubdividedrand <br /> sold. It should be deemed to have the same service availability as the <br /> present plant. The reclamation activity will lessen the water consumption <br /> because the plant can reduce the stress on the water system. He added that <br /> during the drought last year, his plant voluntarily switched from ublic <br /> water to the well system maintained for backup water su l p <br /> The existing land use and the population density p q� <br /> Y n question appear to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.