Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 08-24-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2016 8:31:32 AM
Creation date
10/4/2016 12:11:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/1987
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Commissioners Page Eight August 24 , 1987 <br /> the permit process. If such is possible, perhaps under <br /> the theory that the watershed protection, gives Orange <br /> County standing to ensure that the permit issued and <br /> its conditions adequately address the watershed <br /> concerns, review by the courts would be possible at the <br /> County' s insistence. <br /> Finally, on all of this, the Environmental Policy <br /> Act, North Carolina General Statutes Section 113A-1 et <br /> Sea. and especially G.S. Section 113A-8, empowers "the <br /> governing body of all cities, counties and towns actin, <br /> individually or collective) e <br /> developer of a major development o require <br /> developer ony. . .private sub <br /> detailed statements of the environmental impact mof such <br /> 5 <br /> projects. " A "major development project" is defined to <br /> W include shopping centers, subdivisions and other <br /> o housing developments, and industrial and commercial <br /> E projects. It does not include any projects of less <br /> than two contiguous acres in extent. This legislation <br /> is not precise as to its implementation. It has been <br /> 4 suggested by Milton Heath of the Institute of <br /> .a Government that the County might implement it by <br /> 0 ordinance applicable to all major development projects <br /> g' as defined in the statute and in the ordinance. I <br /> U <br /> o think it also reasonable to assume that the County <br /> could define major development projects less broadly <br /> L9 than is permitted by State law. <br /> Very truly yours , <br /> 0 <br /> 4 <br /> s PA■• <br /> 4 <br /> eof re edhill <br /> t GEG/lsg <br /> xc: Marvin Collins <br /> Albert Kittrell <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.