Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 08-24-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2016 8:31:32 AM
Creation date
10/4/2016 12:11:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/1987
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
25 ,-) <br /> 3 <br /> It is recognized that there are situations where con- <br /> flicts cannot be reduced to an acceptable level or design <br /> standards cannot be met. In these situations, it is <br /> recommended not that driveways be restricted, but that they <br /> be denied. Examples of such situations would be inability to <br /> provide adequate sight distance or inability to restrict <br /> turning movements. When direct access is denied alternatives <br /> such as parallel frontage roads are recommended. Otherwise, <br /> some type of compensation to the denied property owner may be <br /> necessary. <br /> The use of alleys to provide driveway access to the rear <br /> of the lot is suggested as a preferable alternative to <br /> driveway restrictions such as common driveways. Modern <br /> subdivision design, however, tends to discourage the use of <br /> alleys. Low density residential development, that is 4 or <br /> fewer units per acre provide ample lot widths to accommodate <br /> buildings, driveways, and carports or garages . It is only in <br /> the range of 6 units per acre that lot widths become too <br /> narrow to allow all such construction . At such densities, <br /> alleys become an attractive alternative . <br /> Alleys designed to modern standards are worth consider- <br /> ing in conventional subdivisions. However, the trend toward <br /> clustered designs, the integration of various housing types <br /> in a single development, the pressure for more open space and <br /> common areas, and the additional cost and land required by <br /> alleys suggest only a limited role for alleys in future <br /> residential construction . <br /> The design considerations listed above include location <br /> and spacing as driveway design elements. These design <br /> elements refer to the location of a driveway on the property <br /> It serves and spacing between driveways. The recommended <br /> minimum spacing for different types of driveways is contained <br /> in the following table. <br /> Driveway Spacing <br /> Minimum Spacing ( ft. ) Residential Commercial industrial <br /> From property line 0 <br /> From street corner 0 R <br /> Between driveways 3 3 10 <br /> 3 10 <br /> R r Driveway radius <br /> NOTE: All distances are measured from the points where <br /> driveways radii intersect the curb tangent. <br /> These spacing recommendations confirm the professional <br /> position that proper design is adequate to handle vehicular <br /> conflicts. With regard to the Planning Board ' s interest in <br /> driveway controls, they suggest that the basis for any such <br /> control will be Justified on other than technical specifica- <br /> tions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.