Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-24-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 08-24-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2016 8:31:32 AM
Creation date
10/4/2016 12:11:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/24/1987
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> 253 <br /> Driveway Controls <br /> The efficiency and safety of a street or highway depends <br /> on the amount and type of interferences affecting vehicular <br /> movement along it. Significant interferences are caused by <br /> vehicles entering, leaving, or crossing at intersecting <br /> streets or driveways. In order to minimize accidents and to <br /> assure the best overall use of the road by the general <br /> public, it is necessary to regulate vehicular movements in <br /> and out of developments abutting the street or highway and <br /> from cross streets. <br /> With respect to driveways, road users and property <br /> owners have certain rights of access to abutting property as <br /> well as the right to travel on the highway with relative <br /> safety from interference. Since these rights sometimes <br /> conflict, governmental units are generally given the respon- <br /> sibility for reconciling these conflicts in order to satisfy <br /> the needs and rights of all road users with respect to <br /> driveway location, design, and operation . The following <br /> design considerations have been established for use in <br /> preparing recommendations with respect to driveways. <br /> 1 . Direct driveway access to abutting property repre- <br /> sents a service to the traveling public, driveways <br /> are not special concessions to landowners. <br /> 2. The conflict effect of driveways is a function of <br /> traffic flow along the street and at the driveway. <br /> Traffic from adjacent driveways and from driveways <br /> on the opposite side of the road may also conflict. <br /> 3. A low-volume driveway causes relatively little <br /> conflict on a major route and a high-volume drive- <br /> way causes little conflict on a minor route. <br /> 4 . Driveway design elements ( location, „spacing, sight <br /> distance, throat width, radii , angles, deceleration <br /> and acceleration lanes, and grades) should be based <br /> on expected volumes. <br /> 5• In the absence of a separate left-turn lane, the <br /> left-turn into a driveway generally causes the <br /> greatest hazard and street congestion . <br /> 6. The left-turn out of a driveway is the most sensi- <br /> tive to spacing of the driveway relative to the <br /> nearest point of street traffic control . Such <br /> turns are also relatively hazardous. <br /> 7 . The right-turn into a driveway Is the second most <br /> sensitive In respect to spacing from the location <br /> of street traffic control . Such movements also <br /> impede through traffic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.