Agenda - 08-24-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

w ith regard to intersecting streets . 2 4 4 Being part of the subdivision regulations , these requirements would apply to only the creation of new lots . Existing lots would not be made non-conforming as would be the case if these provisions were incorporated in the Zoning Ordinance. This is consistent w ith the concern that additional development w ill create the conflicts cited above. EXISTING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS : IV-B-3-c-8 Marg j_nAL Access Streets Where a subdivision adjoins a heavily traveled street, in the interest of highway safety, the subdivider may be required to provide either a marginal access street parallel to said heavily traveled street or reverse frontage on a smaller street. Where access is available to any internal subdivi - sion street, whether by reverse frontage or other lot arrangement, private driveways shall not have direct access to said heavily traveled street . It is the intent of this section to minimize the number of points of egress and ingress to main roads within Orange County. There is presently no paragraph IV-B-3-c-10 . It would be a new requirement. PROPOSED AMENDMENT: IV-B-3-c-8 Access Restrictions. Where a subdivision adjoins a street classi - fied as arterial or collector in the Prance cpunty Land Use Plan,., in the interest of highway safety, the subdivider may be required to provide a common driyeway, a marginal access street parallel to the arterjal pr cojlector, or reverse frontage on a smaller street when _the onjy access to. the subdivision will bg from an Arterial 9r. collector and when the arterial or collector. that t19 subdivision will access as , traffic volume gf mpre then 5/ 000 vehicles, pr day according to th_e most recent traffic. cunt,. Where access is available to any internal subdivision street, whether by reverse frontage or other lot arrangement, private driveways shall not have access , to the grteri. l or co11ectgr. It is the intent of this section to minimize the