Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
IMIMMIEMM <br /> 3 <br /> Department. <br /> The Plan is composed of two components: <br /> planning principles (Chapter 1-6) <br /> financial/funding data (Chapter 7) <br /> The planning principles are appropriate for inclusion in the Orange <br /> . The <br /> County Comprehensive Plan, asfA heutilization innorangekCounty'snt5-Year <br /> financial data is appropriate <br /> capital improvement pinnin <br /> efforts, to be <br /> The fin nlight of much <br /> public discussion in recent months concerning the broad scop important 1 <br /> If funding support of the Plan is to be realized, P ent <br /> monies requested are clearly identified with specific projects. st <br /> To provide this focus, itrec`mmenpaithat development (for ee <br /> broken down into funding for (a) pools, ark lands fund. <br /> existing publicly-owned sites) , and (c) p <br /> Specifically: <br /> POOLS Two (2) pools - one to be located in the Chapel Hill <br /> $3 ,260, 000 and one in the Hillsborough area. <br /> PARK DEVELOPMENT Development of existing publicly-owned sites. <br /> $738,000 <br /> Efland-Cheeks Community Park $ 113 ,000 <br /> 36,000 <br /> Fairview Community Park 4 486,000 <br /> Cane Creek District Park <br /> opulation demand <br /> PARK LANDS FUND Acreage for <br /> Uspark <br /> ofdevelopment <br /> monies future <br /> would Pinclude securing <br /> $600, 000 warrants. e <br /> options on properties. <br /> 5-YEAR CIP REQUEST: <br /> Pools $ 3,260,000 <br /> Park Development 738,000 <br /> Contingency 399,800 <br /> Park Lands Fund 600, 000 <br /> $ 4,997,800 TOTAL <br /> This recommendation results in a reprrioritizatio ofes the fproject <br /> elements in the first five-year planning period <br /> development of three projects on existing publicly-owned facilities. This <br /> recommendation results in a $1,505, 000 difference (compared with the <br /> original plan request) in needed funding for the first five-year planning <br /> period. This significant cost difference is caused by the exclusion of all <br /> but $600,000 in park land funds in the first five year planning period. <br /> 2 . PROPOSED TEEN SYMPOSIUM <br /> Fletcher Barber as a representative of the Human Services <br /> Management Team presented a tentative planning structure for a teen <br /> symposium. He explained that the team tried to identify all the youth <br /> of <br /> agencies or groups in the County that provides youth services. A slmstsium <br /> these agencies was included as part of the agenda abstract. <br /> steering committee will be selected from the list of youth agency <br /> providers. Their mission will be to (1) finalize goals and objectives for <br /> the symposium, (2) develop a mechanism which permits input from youth <br /> groups not serving on the steering committee and (3) establish symposium <br /> logistics. <br /> Chair Marshall asked that emphasis be placed on the teen problems <br /> that deal with teens moving on into adulthood. The Board Members will call <br /> Mr. Barber with additional names of youth agency providers. Commissioner <br />