Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-02-1988
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1988
>
Agenda - 05-02-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2016 10:01:37 AM
Creation date
10/3/2016 4:25:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/2/1988
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> County Attorney' s concern that those persons <br /> 063 purchasing lots in the subdivision rather than the <br /> general public should have access to the <br /> recreation area. <br /> Eddleman asked if adjoining property owners should <br /> have access to the Class B private road in order <br /> to remain consistent with the policy as indicated <br /> in a previous subdivision (Turtledove) . Best <br /> asked if that could be added as a condition. <br /> Yuhasz expressed concern that such a condition <br /> would allow access without being a party to the <br /> Road Maintenance Agreement. Jacobs noted if the <br /> condition is worded as that in Turtledove <br /> Subdivision (in the event the road is upgraded by <br /> development of adjoining properties, the owners of <br /> the property in the subdivision as well as the <br /> owners of the adjoining properties, will agree to <br /> maintain the private road in an upgraded <br /> condition-NCDOT standards ) until NCDOT accepts the <br /> road for maintenance. <br /> Best indicated that he would like to include a <br /> condition for no further subdivision of the lots <br /> in Theodore Parrish Subdivision. <br /> MOTION: Best moved approval with three conditions : <br /> ( 1 ) that the plat indicate a 30-foot pedestrian <br /> and non-motorized vehicle easement; <br /> (2 ) that the Road Maintenance Agreement state <br /> that in the event that Running Green Road is <br /> upgraded by development of the property to <br /> the east, the owners of property in Theodore <br /> Parrish Subdivision as well as the owners of <br /> the property being developed to the east will <br /> agree to maintain Running Green Road in an <br /> upgraded condition (NCDOT standards ) until <br /> NCDOT accepts the road for maintenance. <br /> (3 ) that there be no further subdivision of the <br /> lots in Theodore Parrish Subdivision. <br /> Seconded by Pilkey. <br /> Eddleman expressed concern with condition #3 in <br /> that a more restrictive requirement might be <br /> placed on the subdivision than future zoning <br /> reclassification might allow. Collins expressed <br /> agreement with Eddleman' s concern. <br /> Yuhasz again expressed concern with adjoining <br /> property owners having immediate access without <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.