Orange County NC Website
152 <br /> COLEMAN, BERNHOLZ, DICKERSON, <br /> BERNHOLZ, GLEDHILL & HARGRAVE <br /> ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br /> F.Q. DRAWER 1529 <br /> 129 E. TRYON ST. <br /> HILLSBOROUGH, N.C. 27278 March 8 , 1988 <br /> 919-7322196 <br /> 919-9428000 <br /> CHAPEL HILL OFFICE <br /> SLIME 20, FRANKLIN BIALDLNC <br /> 137 L FRANKLIN STREET <br /> CHAPFI.HILL, N.C.27514 <br /> 919.92' 7151 <br /> Alma B.COLEMAN,1R <br /> STEVEN A.13ERNH012 Mr . Marvin Collins <br /> DONALD R DICKERSON Director <br /> ROGER B.BERNHOLZ <br /> "- GEOFFREY E. GLEDHILL Orange County Planning Department <br /> DOUGLAS HARAVE - 3 0 6 F Revere Road <br /> C.NICHOLAS HERMAN <br /> KIM ILSTEFFAN Hillsborough , North Carolina 27278 <br /> NATHANIEL.E.CLEMENTS . - <br /> - MARILYN ELLISON <br /> Re : Sign Regulations Contained in the Orange <br /> Of Cannel <br /> A. <br /> 80NNER SAWYER County Zoning Ordinance <br /> (1902-1973) <br /> Dear Marvin: <br /> Enclosed is a copy of a document I received <br /> from the Winter County Attorneys Conference related to <br /> sign control . After reviewing this material and <br /> comparing it with Article 9 in Orange County ' s zoning <br /> regulations I have only one recommended change to the <br /> zoning regulations . I recommend that Section 9 . 5 be <br /> amended to include a sentence after the first sentence <br /> which states : <br /> Any sign authorized by this ordinance may <br /> contain noncommercial copy in lieu of any <br /> other copy . <br /> It strikes me that our sign ordinance is , for <br /> the most part , content neutral . However, the United <br /> States Supreme Court has approved the language above as <br /> demonstrating that a sign ordinance 'containing it did .. <br /> not favor commercial signs over noncommercial signs . <br /> When an opportunity arises I would like to <br /> review with you the status of the County ' s sign survey <br /> and compliance deadline . <br /> Very truly yours , <br /> — jre, Gledhill <br /> GEG/lsg <br /> Enclosure <br />