Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
D � � <br /> W <br /> Lg 1r <br /> 058- <br /> 1 <br /> could be completed and additional amendments <br /> proposed. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> proposed amendments . <br /> Jacobs noted that the time frame for further <br /> consideration is envisioned as part of the <br /> transportation element of the Comprehensive <br /> Land Use Plan. <br /> Hartwell noted that he preferred to see the <br /> lot count in the provisions . <br /> Marshall noted that #2 in the proposed <br /> provisions is a more workable provision than <br /> the one indicating the number of lots . <br /> Hartwell agreed. (Copies of the existing and <br /> proposed provisions included as attachment to <br /> these minutes on pages ) . <br /> Ted Latta expressed concern that #la was too <br /> vague and needed clarification. <br /> Hartwell agreed with Mr. Latta noting that the <br /> developers needed clarity and help now. <br /> • <br /> Carey expressed concern with restrictive <br /> covenants asking if it should be provisions <br /> restricting further subdivision rather than <br /> restrictive covenants . Kirk responded that it <br /> is understood in zoned townships and rural <br /> buffer that minimum lot size is already set <br /> and further subdivision is prohibited. <br /> Ann Joyner, developer, expressed concern with <br /> the lack of specific guidelines. Hartwell <br /> responded that while there still are some <br /> problems with vagueness that this interim <br /> policy does take care of some immediate <br /> problems . <br /> Hartwell moved, seconded by Carey to refer <br /> this item to the Planning Board for <br /> recommendation to the Commissioners on April <br /> 4 . <br /> Vote was unanimous . <br /> c. Comprehensive Plan <br />