Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
093 <br /> Ms. Emily Crudup <br /> January 19, 1988 <br /> Page Three <br /> SSA staff again reaffirms its request that public sanitary sewer easements <br /> be required in addition to the typically required arainaoe easements. <br /> Planning Department has stated that Orange County's current "_ <br /> prohibit the extension of � � polity" is to <br /> watersheds and the Rural Buffer area. Regardless sofvthe present protected <br /> possible need for future extension of printnt these areas <br /> the <br /> should not be dismissed. The advanced provision sewer service into these areas <br /> future public sewer extensions to be undertaken infaemorre�t .melyland <br /> permit <br /> economical manner than would otherwise be possible, in the event they are <br /> determined necessary. <br /> The developers of these projects should be required to provide public sewer <br /> utility easements (minimum width of 30 feet) along the low-lying areas of <br /> the sites to facilitate the timely extension of public sewer service into <br /> and through the proposed subdivisions in the event that action is determined <br /> necessary and desirable in the future. <br /> 3. Sedimentation and Erosion Control. 04ASA has <br /> concerns relative to the need for effectivee sedimenttationsand errosioon <br /> control measures during and after project construction:. Erosion problems <br /> exist at other recent developments within the University Y ed watershed and of continuing concern to � urbloveffective sedimentation and erosion control measeswilbe <br /> in a <br /> installed <br /> along timely manner and permanently maintained. The <br /> 9 proposed roadways must be carefully evaluated to use of assureathat swales <br /> can be established and permanently maintained on the steeper sloped areas. <br /> E. Additional/Specific Comments on Individual Protects <br /> 1. Rock I.eaoe Place Subdivision <br /> • NASA reouests that the 5 stream buffer also be designated as a <br /> sanitary sewer easement. The topography of <br /> plat. Additional ea ; �9 ?hY o� the site is not shown on the <br /> may also easements for future major gravity sewer facilities <br /> y desirable on this site. <br /> • The plat does not state whether individual septic tank/soil absorption <br /> - systems will be used. <br /> -- 2. James i►ine Suivision <br /> _ + No aocitian =omrnen:s. <br /> 3. F.lber~ Reeves Estate 5uivision - - <br />__ ._ 1"OCatio.'�s for the r enoed sanitar <br /> - Creek an file soutia slat of the y seti.�e. easements are along Phils <br /> -_ -- - streams ac" property, and along the two intermittent :, _ <br /> _ -- _ _ =adjacent to Lots 2 - 7 and Lots 1 and E. <br /> - • Effective sedimentation and erosion control measures must be established <br /> i n a timely wanner in the <br /> - - .. intermittent streams. steeper sloped areas adjacent to the <br />