Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-15-1988
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1988
>
Agenda - 03-15-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2016 9:38:23 AM
Creation date
10/3/2016 3:06:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/15/1988
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> g1 Orange Water and Sewer Authority <br /> 400 Jones Ferry toad <br /> OWASA , P.O. Box 366 <br /> Carrooro, NC 27510 <br /> (919) 968-4421 D !� '!�v�?; -'�� <br /> January 19, 19$8 <br /> M . Emily Crudup <br /> Planner II <br /> Planning Department <br /> Oranoe County <br /> 306F Revere Road <br /> Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br /> Dear Emily: <br /> SUBJECT: OWASA STAFF COMMENTS RMATIvE TO: CHESTNUT OAKS SUBDIVISION; <br /> ROCS; LVJGE SUBDIVISION; JAMES VINE SUBDIVISION; ALBERT REEVES <br /> ESTATE SUBDIVISION <br /> Orange Water and Sewer Authority ( .SA) staff has reviewed the plans <br /> provided for the above-.referenced projects. The following comments are <br /> offered for consideration by Orange County during the project review and <br /> approval process. <br /> The a,1ASA Board of Directors has not reviewed and considered the proposed <br /> projects or the CWASA staff comments. However, the Board of Directors has <br /> previously expresses concern about the increased dependence upon on-site and <br /> cluster wastewater disposal systems in public water supply watershed areas <br /> and the Rural Buffer without a comprehensive program in place to provide for <br /> the effective, long-term operation, maintenance and inspection of these <br /> systems. The Board of Directors has also expressed concerns about the need <br /> for effective, permanent sedimentation and erosion control measures, <br /> particularly for all projects within the University Lake and Cane Creek <br /> watersheds. <br /> A. General Comments Armlicable to All Proiec-.s: <br /> Tne pressed subdivisions would all have lot sizes averaging more than 2 <br /> acres. Based on available information, this development density is <br /> presently considered to be generally acceptable from a water quality <br /> ••_ protection standpoint. These projects will result in limited increases in <br /> nonpoint pollution resulting from additional automobile traffic, soil <br /> disturbance, wastewater disposal system operation, and other activities. <br /> - "Mese impacts can be reduced and properly naanaoed through timely • <br /> implementation and ongoing maintenance of effective sedimentation and <br /> erosion control measures and through proper, conservative design, <br /> - - construction, operation and maintenance of the septic tank systems serving <br /> • each low. - <br /> An Equal Ooaortunity Employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.