Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• 33 <br /> vague and needed clarification. <br /> Commissioner Hartwell agreed with Mr. Latta <br /> noting that the developers needed clarity and <br /> help now. <br /> Commissioner Carey expressed concern with <br /> restrictive covenants asking if it should be <br /> provisions restricting further subdivision <br /> rather than restrictive covenants. Kirk <br /> responded that it is understood in zoned <br /> townships and rural buffer that minimum lot <br /> size is already set and further subdivision is <br /> prohibited. <br /> Ann Joyner, developer, expressed concern with <br /> the lack of specific guidelines. Hartwell <br /> responded that while there still are some <br /> problems with vagueness that this interim <br /> policy does take care of some immediate <br /> problems . <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, <br /> seconded by Commissioner Carey to refer this item <br /> to the Planning Board for recommendation to <br /> the Commissioners on April 4 . <br /> Vote: Unanimous . <br /> c. Comprehensive Plan <br /> (1) Section IV - Minimum Design Standards <br /> (References to "Land Use Plan" ) <br /> The staff presentation was made by Eddie Kirk. <br /> This item is to receive citizen comment on <br /> proposed. amendments to Section IV (Required <br /> Minimum Design Standards) of the Subdivision <br /> Regulations. <br /> The Subdivision Regulations currently contain <br /> references which cite the Land Use Plan in one <br /> instance and the Comprehensive Plan in <br /> another. Amendments are being proposed to the <br /> Zoning Ordinance which re-define the nature <br /> and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. To <br /> provide consistent terminology throughout the <br /> Subdivision Regulations, and, to provide <br /> consistency between the Subdivision <br /> Regulations and the Zoning Ordinance, all <br />