Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
creation of new lots. Existing lots would <br /> not be made non-conforming as would be the <br /> case if these provisions were incorporated <br /> in the Zoning Ordinance. This is consistent <br /> w ith the concern that additional development <br /> w ill create the conflicts cited above. <br /> This item was considered at public hearing <br /> on August 24 , 1987 . Subsequent to the <br /> hearing, the Planning Board recommended that <br /> the proposed amendment be referred to the <br /> Ordinance Review Committee for further <br /> study . <br /> EXISTING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS : <br /> IV-B-3-c-8 Maralaal_AQQ& _S.tL1 <br /> Where a subdivision adjoins a heavily <br /> traveled street, in the interest of highway <br /> safety, the subdivider may be required to <br /> provide either a marginal access street <br /> parallel to said heavily traveled street or <br /> reverse frontage on a smaller street. Where <br /> access is available to any internal subdivi- <br /> sion street, whether by reverse frontage or <br /> other lot arrangement, private driveways <br /> shall not have direct access to said heavily <br /> traveled street. It is the intent of this • <br /> section to minimize the number of points of <br /> egress and ingress to main roads within <br /> Orange County. <br /> PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROVISIONS : <br /> IV-B-3-c-8 AQQess RegtrictiQns. <br /> Where a subdivision adjoins a heavily <br /> traveled street classified as_arterial_QL <br /> co I J e ctQL1n_th a Prange _cAni.Q.ty-5lam¢Leh.enalyQ <br /> Elam , in the interest of highway safety, <br /> the subdivider Qhall be required to provide <br /> a common slriy.eway , a marginal access street <br /> parallel to the artetlgl or =hector, or <br /> reverse frontage on a smaller street .ham <br /> t h g only A c cess to t h Q s u bsiix t�.i4� 1Lh� <br /> from an, Ortarill 9r cQlleotot_ Leet Where <br /> access is available to any internal <br /> • <br />