Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-16-1988
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1988
>
Agenda - 02-16-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2016 4:02:27 PM
Creation date
10/3/2016 2:34:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/16/1988
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L_✓F I M <br /> 8 <br /> 165 letter of support from the County <br /> Commissioners relative to current and proposed <br /> planning and zoning policies concerning Eno <br /> River State Park would suffice. Bell was <br /> instructed to draft such a letter for <br /> consideration by the Board of Commissioners. <br /> Subsequent to the January 12 meeting, the <br /> County Attorney provided additional informa- <br /> tion concerning previous action by Orange <br /> County in the form of a policy statement on <br /> the Eno River. The 1976 policy statement and <br /> supporting documentation is provided for the <br /> Board ' s information. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends that the <br /> Planning Board endorse the letter of support. <br /> (A copy of this letter is attached to these <br /> minutes) . <br /> The Planning Board ' s recommendation will be <br /> presented to the Board of Commissioners at its <br /> February 16 , 1988 meeting. <br /> Jacobs expressed concern that the word <br /> committed did not appear in the letter and <br /> noted that he felt the memo of understanding <br /> was more of a commitment of the County than <br /> the proposed letter of support. <br /> Best asked about the comments from the County <br /> Attorney relating to the "contracting away of <br /> legislative authority". Collins responded <br /> that the word "will " contained in the memo of <br /> understanding constitutes a contract. He <br /> continued that this would then be contract <br /> zoning. <br /> Bell indicated that he is in agreement with <br /> the results from the meeting that the County <br /> is doing everything asked for by the State and <br /> that the letter reaffirms that opinion. He <br /> noted the reference in the letter to Planning <br /> Department providing County documents with <br /> those sections highlighted relating to Eno <br /> River State Park. <br /> Jacobs asked what is meant by rezoning of the <br /> Park to Public Interest District. Bell <br /> responded that in the Land Use Plan parks are <br /> classified as a Public Interest Districts and <br /> noted that the zoning for such a district is <br /> very restrictive ( 500,000 sq. ft. minimum lot <br /> size) for a residential structure. Thus, such <br /> districts would be basically kept as parks, <br /> open space, etc. <br /> Jacobs noted that the MOU was more specific in <br /> transition uses and uses in the watershed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.