Agenda - 02-16-1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• 153 14 Jacobs indicated he would like to review the documentation used in developing a compre- hensive land use plan for the area surround- ing the Umstead Park. Yuhasz asked how much input would actually come from Orange County in such a memo. Bell responded that he did not know but that the County Attorney would review anything done in this regard even though it is not an official contract. Pilkey asked if the Memorandum of Understanding is binding. Bell responded that it is not binding like a contract or an agreement such as the Joint Planning Agreement. Best commented that such a memorandum sets ground rules for the County to cooperate with the State. MOTION: Best moved that the Planning Staff be directed to prepare a Memorandum of Understanding to be reviewed at the Long Range Planning Meeting regarding Eno River State Park. Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE: Unanimous. (Taylor out of the room during this vote) . GENDA ITEM $r10: MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC BEARING - 8/24/87 a. Land Dse Plan Amendment LUP-1-87 Chandler Concrete Company Presentation by Gene Bell. On October 10, 1985, Chandler Concrete Company was granted a secondary Land Use Plan amendment, Planned . Development rezoning and Class A Special Use Permit for 1 .41 acres of land on N.C. Highway 10. The request was-. prompted by State mandated requirements to contain. runoff from the existing concrete plant. An adjoining property owner ,--subsequently challenged Orange County' s approval in court. On December 12, � ' ! 1986, the court ruled that the Special Use Permit was invalid since the applicant did not meet the required two-acre minimum lot size standard, and since evidence had not been presented to indicate the project would maintain the value of existing properties in the area. The effect of the court ruling was to place Chandler Concrete Company in violation of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance.