Orange County NC Website
117 <br /> Ms. drily Crudup <br /> January 19, 1988 <br /> Page TWo <br /> 1. Recommendations on Se tic Tank tejs. Individual <br /> so absorpt on ie ds are proposed for ach of these projects.j tanks and <br /> the nature of their design, septic tanks and subsurfacabsorption Because of <br /> should not be expected to give trouble-free service over ifeof systems <br /> how. It has been reported that they have an average effective life of 10 <br /> to 15 years, assuming no misuse, before rehabilitation, modifications or <br /> replacement is necessary. Furthermore, leaving septic tank system <br /> maintenance solely to the discretion of the typical homeowner, with the need <br /> for septic tank pumping and maintenance to be determined as they deem <br /> necessary or as problems occur, is, in essence, very limited control over <br /> the potential adverse impact of these systems on water quality. Therefore, <br /> consideration should be given to an alternative septic tank system design <br /> and maintenance concept. OIASA staff requests that careful consideration of <br /> the following recommendations be given by the developers of each project, <br /> Orange County, and Orange County Health <br /> partment: <br /> a. A dual absorption field system should be required to be installed at the <br /> time each lot is developed (alternating use between the two fields on a <br /> regular basis) , with provision of an additional back-up field area for <br /> one of the dual drainfields. OWASA staff recognizes that this will <br /> result in increased construction cos and greater initial clearing for <br /> the system installation; however, the long-term benefits to water <br /> quality, public health and future ho <br /> should offset these costs. wners within these subdivisions <br /> b. All septic tank system replacement si es which have been identified by <br /> the Orange County Health Department should be clearly designated on the <br /> plat and deed/survey for each lot. These sites must be required to <br /> remain undisturbed and reserved by present and future owners for such <br /> use, in the event the primary site malfunctions. <br /> there have been cases where reserve sites identifieeddby th e aware Hal that <br /> Department have, in the past, been rendered unusable due to construction <br /> of improvements after the initial residence has been completed. <br /> 2. Reservation of Sanita Sewer Easements. Presently, he <br /> of Directors has an interim policy which strictly limit the extension� rof <br /> public water and sewer services into the U iversity Lake watershed <br /> interim policy will be reconsidered follow ng the completion of the This <br /> comprehensive watershed study, which is in progress. Although <br /> do not call for G'lASA to extend public utility u9 the water plans tershed <br /> area or the Rural Buffer, (NASA must be able to provide su h services within <br /> these areas in the event local governing ies determine it necessary and <br /> appropriate in the future. <br />