Agenda - 02-01-1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

, r rage S , Planning staff recommends approval of this preliminary 0.5 plat subject to an approved stormwater management plan. For copy of memo from Erosion Control Officer, see pages 16 and 17 of these minutes. For copy of report from Phillip Post and Associates entitled Storm water Management Report for Site of John Hackney Heirs Subdivision. See pages 18-23 of these minutes. . Greenberg inquired if the Towns had reviewed the proposal. Coutu responded that no written response had been received from either the Towns or OWASA. Greenberg felt it was imperative to get a close review of the project by the Towns given the presence of the critical feeder creeks, Phils and Neville Creeks, Collins clarified that the staff had net with Carrboro staff, OWASA staff and TJCOG staff for the purpose of jointly reviewing the proposal. Kizer inquired if the Town had any problem with the proposal. Faircloth responded that the staffs had reviewed the project interns of the Carrboro proposed Soil & Erosion Control standards. Carrboro staff had indicated that there were no problems with the subdivision meeting the requirements. Gordon asked if this was the usual procedure pursued by the staff with project review. Coutu responded staff always notifies the Towns in writing and that the Towns generally respond by phone. He added that in this case the County staff went further and set up a meeting with all the relevant staffs to review the project. Greenberg expressed a desire to have written reports on the project from both Towns given the proximity of the project to the University Lake. Pearson questioned the request stating the Towns had been notified and had not given a written response. Shanklin agreed that further delay was unwarranted. Gordon added that legitimate concerns were needed to delay consideration of the proposal, that is deviations from • established procedures or unanswered questions. Kizer noted that staff had gone further in review than normal procedures called for. Gordon asked if Greenberg had specific questions. Greenberg asked why 10 instead of a. 25 year peak flow was used- Phili1 Post, engineer, responded that he had followed the ordinance specifically, indicating that this requirement was specified in.the ordinance and tracked standard procedure used in North Carolina. Greenberg asked if lots are to be sold later to individual builders. Post answered affirmatively. Greenberg expressed concern about siting of homes without Planning Board review.