Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-01-1988
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1988
>
Agenda - 02-01-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2016 4:03:59 PM
Creation date
10/3/2016 12:30:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/1/1988
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
G. NORMAN AcKER, III Q f D) <br /> i ATTORNEY AT LAW <br /> 800=D FRANKLIN SQUARE <br /> CHAPEL HILL, N.C. 27514 <br /> 919-96S-1900 <br /> December 14 , 1987 <br /> Ms. Shirley Marshall <br /> Chairman, Orange County Commissioners <br /> 106 E. Margaret Lane <br /> Hillsborough, Nc 27278 <br /> Dear Ms. Marshall, <br /> I am writing this letter on behalf of myself (as a citizen) <br /> and my clients, Henry Morris, Harold Herndon and Eddie Crain. We <br /> are greatly concerned about the county ordinance as it relates to <br /> Home Occupation Permits. We appreciate the hard work the <br /> planning board and the commissioners have put into the proposed <br /> amendments to the ordinance in this respect, but we feel the <br /> changes do not go far enough. <br /> Home Occupation Permits can be appropriate for part-time or <br /> "low impact" businesses in residential zones. On the other hand , <br /> the operation of full-time "high impact" commercial activities <br /> makes residential zoning meaningless'. We believe the ordinance <br /> should be amended to make regulations tighter on home occupations <br /> and to clarify that home occupations are not intended to be full- <br /> time , high impact commercial activities. <br /> Our specific complaint deals with the operation of auto <br /> repair businesses as home occupations. It seems reasonable that <br /> an individual should be able to work on automobiles in his spare <br /> time or as a second job at his home. I suspect there are <br /> hundreds of people in the county doing so. However, running a . <br /> full-time business is a different matter. Not only is this use <br /> not "customarily incidental" to the residential use, but it also <br /> has a tremendous impact on the neighborhood. <br /> For example, each car which is being repaired at an auto <br /> repair shop generates at least 6 vehicle trips in the residential <br /> neighborhood. Typically, the owner drives his car in, with a <br /> friend or family member following behind. The friend then drives <br /> the owner home or to work. .Later , the friend brings the owner <br /> back to pick up the car and they both leave. Simply counting <br /> these trips shows that at least 6 trips are generated. In <br /> addition, if the mechanic must drive the car to check its proper <br /> functioning, more trips are necessary. Furthermore, a full-time <br /> auto repair shop will typically have daily deliveries of parts, <br /> uniforms, tools, etc. , as well as perhaps towing services, all of <br /> which generate substantial traffic. <br /> In addition, auto repair shops, by their nature, require a <br /> substantial amount of space for the storage of cars being worked <br /> on, which can cause a negative impact on the neighborhood. They <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.