Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-04-1988
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1988
>
Agenda - 01-04-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2016 3:19:42 PM
Creation date
10/3/2016 11:25:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/4/1988
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> inspected. technically <br /> 10. The system <br /> should be operated by a <br /> qualified party <br /> 11. replacement costs should be <br /> Pump life, repair, and <br /> addressed. the following <br /> Regarding the development layout► OWASA had , <br /> comments: <br /> t, in the watershed should b=otection consistent of the <br /> 1. Developmen ublic objective P <br /> the primary Public supply• <br /> public drinking and con- <br /> investigation of site suitability may <br /> A detailed sorption fields <br /> 2• of the need for dual absorp field area► <br /> sideration greater absorption to the pro- <br /> result int rn nee <br /> ould require modifications <br /> which in out and development density- <br /> posed subdivision lay will not be <br /> 3 • provide <br /> assurance that open space areas <br /> developed, erosion <br /> assurance that sedimentation and manner <br /> 4• provide a timely <br /> control measures l be stalled in <br /> and permanently maintained* <br /> utility easements should be <br /> wer obtained <br /> serviices incthe <br /> 5. public u public s in the <br /> itate the provision of <br /> determined necessary <br /> event <br /> such extension is <br /> future. courtesy <br /> The Town of Carrboro has the proposede fallowing planned development- <br /> review <br /> comments r are egarding based an Carrboro-designated watershed <br /> The comments irements. <br /> zoning district requ <br /> -:foot buffer would be required on either side of <br /> 1. A fifty located on the site. <br /> the intermittent streams <br /> of land to the north would <br /> the tract <br /> 2. proposed plans for phased required (ie- r <br /> maximum allowed ands <br /> 3. Impervious surface limitatans. <br /> hou located <br /> proposed) sld be an the P <br /> reater than 18" should <br /> 4. Trees having a diameter g _-_---on landscape plans. <br /> The agency or organization which will be <br /> responsible ;- <br /> B. tenance of the proposed sewer treatment facil� :. <br /> for main noted on the plans. <br /> ides should be clearly ed for the sewage <br /> all state permits required to issuanCe <br /> 5. Copies of submitted p <br /> disposal systems should be <br /> of any building permits. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.