Orange County NC Website
236 6 <br /> had not been presented to prove that the use <br /> will not maintain or enhance the value of <br /> contiguous property. Seconded by Kramer. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed ( Best) . <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved that substantial evidence had not <br /> been presented that the use is not in <br /> compliance with the general plans for the <br /> physical development of the county as embodied <br /> in these regulations or in the Comprehensive <br /> Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange <br /> County Board of Commissioners. Seconded by <br /> Kramer. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed ( Best) . <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved approval of the request with the <br /> eight staff conditions and the additional <br /> condition that any utilities be underground. <br /> Seconded by Lewis. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed ( Best - wished to be consistent and <br /> remain opposed to the request throughout <br /> the entire process) . <br /> rM <br />