Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2.34 5 <br /> Table) . Seconded by Yuhasz. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: Kramer moved in support of staff findings on <br /> Articles 7 . 17 and 7 . 15 (Development standards <br /> and site planning standards) . Seconded by <br /> Pilkey. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved agreement with staff findings on <br /> Articles 7 . 15. 10 b-d ( landscaping) , Article 5 <br /> ( lot size standards) , Article 6 (Dimensional <br /> Requirements, Article 9 ( Signs) , Article 10 <br /> (Off-street Parking) , and Article 12 <br /> ( Landscaping & Screening) . Seconded by Swann. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Best - disagreed with internal <br /> relationship regarding a well organized <br /> arrangement of buildings and use areas. ) <br /> GENERAL FINDINGS <br /> Article 8.2.2 <br /> MOTION: Best moved that the use will not promote the <br /> public health, safety and general welfare if <br /> located where proposed and developed and <br /> operated according to the plan as submitted. <br /> Seconded by Pilkey. <br /> Pilkey asked Best the reason for the motion. <br /> Best responded that the general history of the <br /> case convinced him that the health and safety <br /> was not being promoted. <br /> VOTE: 1 in favor. (Best) <br /> 9 opposed. <br /> ALTERNATE MOTION: Eddleman moved that a preponderance of evidence <br /> had not been presented to prove that the use <br /> will not promote the public health, safety and <br /> general welfare if located where proposed and <br /> developed and operated according to the plan as <br /> submitted. Seconded by Kramer. <br /> VOTE: 9 in favor. <br /> 1 opposed (Best) . <br /> MOTION: Best moved that the use will not maintain or <br /> enhance the value of contiguous property. <br /> Seconded by Pilkey. <br /> VOTE: . 1 in favor. (Best) <br /> 9 opposed. <br /> ALTERNATE MOTION: Eddleman moved that a preponderance of evidence <br />