Agenda - 12-15-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

5) no permanent structure should be built in the vegetative buffer, 6) no hazardous material use or storage, 7) special ordinances to consider - floodway, sedimentation, unsuitable land, zoning, suodivision, mobile hose, etc. .. Special Use Provisions hew development not complying with the above requirements could be allowed on a case-bv-case basis if special safeguards against contamination are proposed and approved by the appropriate state authority. D. STATE ACTICHS 'Point sources) t. identify domestic Aischarger; ono their effluent characteristics a. Review compliance and ambient water quality data related to facility. b. Review facility age and water quality violations. c. Seek additional physical, chemical or biological data that say be needed, especially toxicant and bioassay data. 2. Recommend methods to control any point source problem. `his say __include modifying treatment procedures, installing new equipment, upgrading an entire system, and wastewater treatment reliability eeasures may be needed. E spi E/failure containment plan say _also 3e,r�quired. 3. Evaluate the potential for future domestic dischargers (niter, type, and location)... Table 4. PP.OSRAM OUTLINE FOR l!5-jII A US-III water supply would have the same requirements as the old A-II classification. This classification has no categorical restrictions on watershed development or discharges unlike the restrictions placed on YS-I and HS-II water supplies. However, these watersheds also need protection from sources of point and nonpoint pollution. DEM has an ongoing program to investigate toxic substances in large watersheds (typically VS-III water supplies). To date, two Piedmont mater supply sources have been evaluated. The resulting reports include to-depth evaluations of possible toxicant sources in the watersheds. analysis of available toxicant data from point and nonpoint sources, and recommendations for future DEM actions to protect these lakes from toxicants. Future studies will focus on _ other large watersheds to address similar water quality concerns. The nonpoint source control program for a NS-III watershed would be similar to one for a HS-II watershed and allow sewer extensions outside the critical area. High potential for contamination of the water supply would prevent hazardous waste facilities from locating within the watershed. However, more flexibility would be al:owed-for growth of urban areas if appropriate measures are taken to plan development and control runoff.