Orange County NC Website
2 <br /> Possible options for updated fee levels include: <br /> 1. As calculated, adopting at some percentage of the MSIF. <br /> 2. Collapsing the Single Family Detached category in the Orange County Schools district <br /> (due to an unexpected result in this category), charging the "Average" for this housing <br /> type in this district, charging fees as calculated for other housing types, and adopting at <br /> some percentage of the MSIF. <br /> 3. Collapsing all housing type categories in both or either school districts, charging the <br /> "Average" calculation by housing type, and adopting at some percentage of the MSIF. <br /> a. Note for this option: Accessory dwelling units (e.g., granny flats) are included in <br /> the multi-family category (0-2 bedrooms) so setting the fee for the "average" <br /> calculation may result in an increase for accessory dwelling units, depending on <br /> the percentage of MSIF chosen. <br /> 4. Options 1-3 can also be implemented by increasing the percentage of MSIF over a period <br /> of time (e.g., adopt at x% effective 2017, y% effective 2018, and z% effective 2019). <br /> It should be noted that the adopted percentage of MSIF must be the same for all housing types <br /> (e.g., fees cannot be adopted at 40% MSIF for one housing type and 60% MSIF for a different <br /> housing type). <br /> Attachment 2 is the section of the County's General Code of Ordinances that pertains to the <br /> Educational Facilities Impact Fee with proposed amendments shown in "track changes" format. <br /> Proposed amendments to this section of the Code of Ordinances include: <br /> • Adding definitions for the various housing types. <br /> • Adding language in Section 30-33 that would require age restricted units that do not <br /> remain age restricted for at least 20 years be required to pay the difference between the <br /> age restricted fee paid and the non-age-restricted fee in effect at the time a unit is no <br /> longer age restricted. <br /> • Adding language in Section 30-35(e) clarifying under what conditions a refund would be <br /> issued if impact fees were reduced for a particular housing unit type. <br /> • Adding language in Section 30-38 to recognize conditional zoning, which was adopted in <br /> 2011 when the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) was adopted. <br /> Since 1995, Orange County has offered an impact fee reimbursement program for school <br /> impact fees paid on affordable housing units. From FY2009-10 through FY2015-16, $606,318 <br /> in collected impact fees was reimbursed for the 77 affordable single-family housing units and <br /> one apartment building containing 6 affordable multi-family units constructed in that time period. <br /> Planning staff held a public information meeting on September 26, beginning at 6:00 p.m. <br /> Despite publishing display ads in two newspapers, only one person (a staff member with the <br /> Town of Chapel Hill's Planning Department) attended the public information meeting. This topic <br /> was also discussed at the September 29 Joint BOCC/School Boards meeting. Staff from <br /> TischlerBise was in attendance at both of these meetings. <br /> At the September 6 BOCC meeting, the proposed schedule indicated that updated fee levels <br /> could potentially be adopted after the conclusion of the October 4 public hearing. Due to <br /> agenda preparation constraints, staff is recommending that adoption consideration occur at the <br /> October 18, 2016 BOCC meeting. <br />