Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-18-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 08-18-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2016 11:29:50 AM
Creation date
9/29/2016 3:42:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/18/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
424
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WATERSHED PROTECTION PAGE 2 <br /> Division of Environmental Management (DEM) , which must approve <br /> the proposed waste system, are not required by state statute , and <br /> the necessary permits can be issued routinely and quickly once <br /> minimum state- standards are met . Such standards may not be <br /> sufficient to protect our water . It is particularly unfortunate <br /> that there is no provision in the applicable state regulations <br /> for more stringent standards for alternative private waste <br /> systems in drinking water watersheds. <br /> We ask you to do all that you can on behalf of the citizens <br /> of southern Orange County to protect our water . Specifically, we <br /> ask you to intercede on our behalf : <br /> --to petition for hearings before the DEM on the water and <br /> sewer systems. DEM is the agency responsible for reviewing <br /> permits for Amberly's proposed utilities. We note that <br /> citizens were told at the local level that imput should be <br /> directed to the state . But DEM permitting officials now say <br /> there is no provision for public imput in what they <br /> characterize as strictly a " technical review" . <br /> --to petition for hearings before the state public Utilities <br /> Commission which must license the company to operate the <br /> private utilities; <br /> --to support OWASA in maintaining its policy of not extending <br /> public water and sewer service into the watershed during the <br /> period of its study. We note that the developer has asked <br /> OWASA to help design , own , and/or operate the septic system <br /> and to provide water for fire protection . Either of these <br /> constitute extension of service and are a clear attempt to <br /> get around the moratorium. <br /> --to require the developer to prepare an environmental impact <br /> assessment under the state environmental policy act and to <br /> adapt a county environmental policy ordinance which would <br /> facilitate such actions in the future . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.