Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
ion <br /> the entire length to the boundary line. <br /> in the existing pond. <br /> (7 ) Post signs to prohibit swimming <br /> The Duke Forest Advisory Committee has reviewed plans for <br /> the subdivision and expressed a�CncernsThregare ding wa <br /> quality and recreation greenwaY concerned i <br /> about the impact of development and the proposed <br /> cation field on the water quality <br /> One of the results of the cluster <br /> Piney Mountain is to maintain water squ litionby avoiding 9 <br /> development near water courses . <br /> control measures as in th squalityxr maTheesonl <br /> plan will also help to assure <br /> analysis for the nitrification nffieldsapreparedesignDennis J . <br /> Osborne and Associates indicates <br /> rate for the nitrification fields less <br /> suggested in research publications . <br /> water quality . With irdigardoheaccess concern <br /> to Dukeabout <br /> Forest, pro- <br /> posed greenway providing public Count does not grant access to <br /> dedication of land to Orange Any County to the contrary <br /> adjoining private property . Y <br /> is incorrect. The land on <br /> dedicated to Orange County is to <br /> tion and/or open space, not access to Duke Forest. <br /> The Planning Director recommends the following two addi - <br /> tional conditions to address concerns expressed by the Duke <br /> Forest Advisory Committee: <br /> (8) A copy of the July 28, 1987 memorandum from the Duke <br /> Forest Advisory Committee should be submitted to the <br /> developer and the NC Division of Environmental <br /> rMaalManage- <br /> ment for use in preparation, review, and app of <br /> the low pressure sewage disposal system permit. <br /> (9) In order to clarify the purpose of land being dedicated <br /> to Orange County, the Final Plat should label the site <br /> "Land dedicated to Orange County for recreation and/or <br /> open space purposes. " <br /> On July 28, after the Planing tBoard had ngrecommended as <br /> approval of the preliminary plan, <br /> advised by the project engineer of an error in the cal - <br /> culated total acreage of the 12$x022, not 12$. 56t acQesl <br /> acreage of Piney Mountain <br /> This decrease in calculated land area results <br /> srmin a one-dot une <br /> reduction in the total number er Subdiaision Regulations. <br /> Section IV-B-10-b of <br /> Therefore, the Planning Director commends the addition of <br /> the following condition of approval : <br /> ( 10 ) The preliminary plan for Piney Mountain should be <br /> considered with the deletion of lot number 59 from <br /> Phase Two. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: Manager recommends approval per the Planning Board ' s <br /> recommendation, and injnudp�gecto .e additional conditions <br /> recommended by the Planning <br />