Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-26-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 05-26-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2016 8:14:51 AM
Creation date
9/29/2016 1:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/1987
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> the ban on leghold traps. He stated it doesn't seem germaine to the basic <br /> problems that prompted the Ordinance. The problems sited in this section <br /> should be dealt with as a separate issue and not in this Ordinance. <br /> DAVID DAVIS , member of the Board of Directors for the Eno River <br /> Association, objected to the differential fee schedule stating there are <br /> parts of rural Orange County that don't need this Ordinance. He <br /> emphasized that he doesn't need anyone coming to his home and telling him <br /> how to take care of his dogs. He asked that the Ordinance be restudied. <br /> GENE HANRANAN , told about a pet of his which got caught in a trap. He <br /> feels that the legislation should be temporary and that the County should <br /> work with the cattlemen to solve their problems. <br /> TOM GIDUZ talked about the spaying and neutering of dogs and the cost <br /> to the County of the unwanted animals. The only effective way to control <br /> the dog and cat population is through spaying and neutering. He noted <br /> that 3800 animals were put to sleep at the shelter last year. Animals who <br /> are wearing I.D. tags are traced and returned to their homes. He <br /> presented a petition with 1, 628 signatures of Orange County residents who <br /> supported the ban on the steel leghold trap and a petition with <br /> 335 non-Orange County signatures. <br /> JOAN CUNNINGHAM , former Director of the Animal Shelter in Guilford <br /> County and currently Assistant District Attorney in Durham County, spoke <br /> in support of the Ordinance. She has prosecuted under the State Animal <br /> Law and also the Durham County Ordinance. She stated that having an <br /> Ordinance with the specificity as this proposed Ordinance is a very <br /> valuable tool for a prosecutor or an animal control officer or for anyone <br /> who is in the business of enforcing animal laws or controlling animal <br /> behavior. The expanded section on definitions is very helpful and the <br /> expanded section on cruelty is very impressive. It complements State Law <br /> and serves as notice to the Community what this community, through its <br /> Board of Commissioners, feels is inappropriate and cruel behavior. The <br /> Ordinance is progressive and anticipates the problems that Orange County <br /> will face. She urged that the Commissioners pass the Ordinance as <br /> proposed. <br /> ALICE DAWSON stated that while the Ordinance will not prevent all the <br /> problems associated with animals, it will establish the tone of how the <br /> community feels is the proper way of dealing with animals and the <br /> responsibility of pet owners. The differential licensing will provide an <br /> incentive to people and encourage owners to have their animals spayed or <br /> neutered. <br /> MARGIE LINDEKE , veternarian, stated that animals live longer and <br /> healthier lives when they are neutered. She spoke in support of the leash <br /> law as contained in the Ordinance. She presented a petition with the <br /> signatures of fourteen veternarians who support the ban on the leghold <br /> trap. <br /> KAREN WYSOCKI , resident of Hillsborough, commented on the dogs and <br /> cats that live next door. She suggested that Section 21 be amended to <br /> include that the issue of odor be considered a nuisance. Under Section 17 <br /> - non-commercial kennels she suggested that "animals kept in large numbers <br /> for domestic enjoyment" be added to the phase animals "keep for children, <br /> etc. " be included. <br /> WILLARD WARD , member of the Animal Control Task Force, stated several <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.