Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-26-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 05-26-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2016 8:14:51 AM
Creation date
9/29/2016 1:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/26/1987
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Marshall <br /> June 12, 1987 <br /> Page Two <br /> Trappers often try to justify the use of steel traps by <br /> saying that such trapping is necessary to prevent <br /> overpopulation of wildlife. This assertion is simply <br /> inaccurate. First, animal populations have survived for <br /> millions of years without the intervention of man or traps to <br /> limit population. And, as biologists know, most wild animals <br /> tend to limit their own populations through natural means <br /> (i .e. , when populations go up, reproduction is reduced so that <br /> animal populations remain within the limits of their food <br /> supply) . In addition, contrary to assertions at the hearing <br /> by Mr. Randall Wilson, populations of fur-bearing and other <br /> animals do not normally fluctuate greatly in the absence of <br /> trapping. To be sure, wildlife populations do fluctuate <br /> somewhat. However, no better proof of the absence of major <br /> population fluctuations where steel jaw traps are not used can <br /> be found than to examine the status of animals in states where <br /> these traps have been banned. Florida, Rhode Island, <br /> Massachusetts and New Jersey have banned or largely banned <br /> trapping with the steel jaw trap; yet, none of these states <br /> have reported major fluctuations in wildlife populations or <br /> disease outbreaks among wildlife populations. Moreover, <br /> trappers generally only trap fur-bearing animals. Yet, other <br /> wildlife species such as songbirds and most rodents, which are <br /> not subject to any trapping, do not normally fluctuate to any <br /> significant degree. Thus, it can readily be seen, that <br /> trapping is not conducted and is not necessary to limit <br /> fluctuations in wildlife populations. <br /> A related claim is that the use of steel traps is <br /> necessary to limit wildlife disease and starvation and to <br /> maintain healthy wildlife populations. Contrary to this <br /> claim, the genetic makeup and size of animals largely <br /> determines which animals will succumb to disease and <br /> starvation. Trappers cannot know which animals they will trap <br /> because steel traps are not selective (i .e. , they trap any <br /> animal which steps into them) . In fact, there is substantial <br /> reason to believe that trappers are more likely to catch <br /> healthy animals (because they are mobile and active) than sick <br /> and diseased animals. <br /> Trappers often claim that steel traps are used to prevent <br /> starvation in wild animals. Such an assertion will not stand <br /> scrutiny. Trapping is done because animal pelts are <br /> valuable. A few years ago, bobcat pelts were selling for as <br /> much as $650. 00 each and bobcats were trapped in large <br /> numbers. All wild animals are potentially subject to <br /> starvation, but trappers seek to use steel traps to trap the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.