Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-19-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 05-19-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 4:19:00 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 11:56:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/19/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Existing Thoroughfare Plans <br /> One of the chief advantages of using travel forecasting models is the ability to <br /> logically test new roadway schemes for their ability to reduce traffic on <br /> existing thoroughfares. Assuming that the municipalities' existing thoroughfare <br /> plans were completely implemented, an analysis of projected traffic for the years <br /> 2000 and 2010 was made to determine the adequacy of these plans. Figures 5.2 <br /> (four different maps of the area divided into quadrants with the existing <br /> thoroughfare plans as currently adopted) graphically illustrate the conclusions of <br /> this research. <br /> As the figures illustrate, the existing thoroughfare plans do contain sufficient <br /> recommended improvements to deal with most of the projected travel within the <br /> areas they cover. The problems lie primarily on the fringes of these plans and in <br /> the areas which are not covered at all, especially southwest Durham, southeast <br /> Durham, northeast Durham, northwest Durham, and central Orange County. <br /> Of immediate concern is the adequacy of the roads near I-40. Each interchange <br /> will be the subject of intense development pressure while creating radical shifts <br /> in travel demand on what are generally two-lane rural roads. Attention to this <br /> feeder system is vital. <br /> The radial facilities serving north Durham will become critically deficient before <br /> the turn of the century. New avenues of access to the interstate system both east <br /> and west of Durham could do much to address these deficiencies. <br /> The thoroughfare plan for Chapel Hill and Carrboro is significantly different from <br /> that of Durham. Durham's gridiron-based street system includes a variety of ways <br /> (albeit confusing to the occasional visitor) to drive across town. As such. <br /> motorists can avoid traffic tie-ups and thereby balance out demand on the network. <br /> The Chapel Hill-Carrboro system contains more cul-de-sacs and fewer collector <br /> streets and major thoroughfares. For this reason, the inadequacies of the major <br /> thoroughfare system are less avoidable and more demanding of sufficient attention. <br /> Table 5.1 lists all projects which are currently programmed for construction by <br /> the NCDOT. These projects total nearly $335 Million. <br /> Table 5.2 lists those projects which are needed immediately, but unprogrammed. <br /> These projects total over $180 Million. <br /> Table 5.3 lists those projects which are anticipated to be needed before the year <br /> 2000. These projects total 5334 Million. <br /> These combined unmet needs, totalling over a half billion dollars include only the <br /> areas covered within the existing thoroughfare plans. The needs associated with <br /> the uncovered areas will be developed during this study's next phase. <br /> 5.4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.